Talk:Notch signaling pathway
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Broken link
[edit]"notch signaling pathway in Homo sapiens" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.92.147.100 (talk) 17:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
New diagram
[edit]I changed the picture to a slightly more colourful one. I hope I've kept the essentials correct. Codec 10:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Notch in Immunology
Notch signaling has been found to play a crucial role in T cell lineage commitment. I have added a reference to a review in current opinion rheumatology. There are more original articles in Pubmed and we can actually create a new page on Notch role in T cell development rather than add more here —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abledoc (talk • contribs) 00:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Differences with old diagram
[edit]The previous diagram showed Notch 1 extracellular with O-fucose tetrasaccharides and O-glucose trisaccharides on the individual EGF-like repeats that actually contain the sugars (there is a consensus sequence for these types of glycosylation). There is a small, mostly transmembrane remnant of Notch still in the membrane subsequent to gamma-secretase cleavage which would emphasise that both the Notch extracellular domain and and NICD are being cleaved away from the larger Notch heterodimer during the signaling process.
- Hopefully added back in Codec 09:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
I'll probably add a schematic of Notch 1 that is blown up, shows the EGF-like repeats, glycosylation, other domains of Notch etc. in the future.
I like the picture but it would be good if the small differences could be made more like the previous one for increased accuracy, and because future pictures will be related to the previous one I put up. If you like, I could provide the pictures directly, and you could spruce them up for presentation. Stauffenberg, 16 December 2005
- I'm not a great artist, but if you want to send me sketches, I can try enhancing them. Or just upload them and I'll replace them if I think I can do better. Likewise please change the current one if you wish.Codec 16:55, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
Info boxes have been deleted - just wondering why?
[edit]Saving them here in case - it took a while to find all this.Codec 06:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Notch homolog 1 (Drosophila) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | |||||||
Symbol | NOTCH1 | ||||||
Alt. symbols | TAN1 | ||||||
NCBI gene | 4851 | ||||||
HGNC | 7881 | ||||||
OMIM | 190198 | ||||||
RefSeq | NM_017617 | ||||||
UniProt | P46531 | ||||||
Other data | |||||||
Locus | Chr. 9 q34.3 | ||||||
|
Notch homolog 2 (Drosophila) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | |||||||
Symbol | NOTCH2 | ||||||
NCBI gene | 4853 | ||||||
HGNC | 7882 | ||||||
OMIM | 600275 | ||||||
RefSeq | NM_024408 | ||||||
UniProt | Q04721 | ||||||
Other data | |||||||
Locus | Chr. 1 p13 | ||||||
|
Notch homolog 3 (Drosophila) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifiers | |||||||
Symbol | NOTCH3 | ||||||
Alt. symbols | CADASIL | ||||||
NCBI gene | 4854 | ||||||
HGNC | 7883 | ||||||
OMIM | 600276 | ||||||
RefSeq | NM_000435 | ||||||
UniProt | Q9UM47 | ||||||
Other data | |||||||
Locus | Chr. 19 p13.2-13.1 | ||||||
|
- Although you should probably ask Arcadian, the user who deleted them, I guess it is because the boxes were about the (Drosophila homologues of the) protein and this article should be concerned with Notch signalling, which involves much more than just Notch. Flyguy649 talk contribs 06:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
A diagram you can use
[edit]- File:Schematic of the Notch1-RBP-Jκ-Hes1 signaling network.png - just uploaded. Cheers, --CopperKettle 13:55, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Notch in nervous system development
[edit]This page has a collection of references related to Notch signaling in Drosophila neuronal cells. Might possibly be appropriate for the external links section. SteveChervitzTrutane (talk) 05:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
'Myriad'
[edit]'Myriad' is rather exaggerated language. It means something like 'ten thousand'. Changed to 'many'. I hope you agree. Margaret52 (talk) 14:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]The article NOTCH proteins should be merged into this article since it adds very little information that would not benefit from being here, unless more can be found to say about the NOTCH proteins. WeigelaPen (talk) 12:15, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
New content added
[edit]Sections on Notch signaling in embryogenesis & development were added as part of Saint Louis University Wikipedia:School and university projects. We are all newbies in this class, so a review by a more experienced editor is welcome and appreciated.--Biolprof (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Notch signaling pathway/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Identification of Notch mutations The first published description of the Notch mutation is described in Dexter, J.S. (1914), The analysis of a case of continous variation in Drosophila by a study of its linkage relationships. Am. Nat. 68, 712-758 and not by Morgan in 1917 as stated in the wikipedia Notch entry. Morgan and Bridges isolated new Notch alleles only in 1916 which are described in the 1917 publication, Metz and Bridges, (1917), Incompatibility of mutant race in Drosophila. PNAS, 3, 673-678. |
Last edited at 01:43, 1 January 2012 (UTC). Substituted at 01:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Embryo Polarity in C. Elegans
[edit]In the Embryo polarity section, what process in C. Elegans is this sentence referring to? "During C. elegans, GLP-1, the C. elegans Notch homolog, interacts with APX-1, the C. elegans Delta homolog." There is obviously something missing. --Spucky123r (talk) 07:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Bogart, snooker and Notch
[edit]One reason for a {{citation needed}} template was: "This claim needs a reliable source; Bogart was a famous actor, and his major biographies don't mention snooker." As there was no mention of anyone called Bogart, nor of snooker or actors anywhere else (including the text preceding said template, I doubt this is the correct reason. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)