Talk:Not 4 Sale (Kardinal Offishall album)
This article was nominated for deletion on November 28, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rhianna Is Not In Numba 1
[edit]If you go to Kardinal Offishall's Official Imeem page he has the mastered CD, they have Nicole Sherzinger in place of Rhianna I corrected this earlier but some people just have to change it back to the wrong one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.99.106 (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
YES SHE IS! Rihanna is correct, she's on the retail, Nicole of PSD was taken off the album. Probably due to PSD's upcoming album, label didn't want it to interfere.
-Jome
Alright, sounds good, because if you visit imeem.com/kardinaloffishall shes on there and it said its the preview of whats coming out september 9th
But Dre just produced for Slim Thug lol, so no he doesn't just produce for his camp...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NpsKHkvBw0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.99.106 (talk) 17:54, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
False Credits, there's no JR Rotem
[edit]Here's the real credits for the album: http://www.dubcc.com/forum/index.php?topic=190386.0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by LiLFame (talk • contribs) 01:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- At the end of the track "Nina", Kardinal says "Dups", which is further proof that it was produced by Supa Dups, rather than J.R. Blackjays1 (talk) 05:36, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes Rihanna is on "Number 1"
[edit]I have some evidence that she is on the officail track because all official tracks are always put on myspace pages and on Kardinals page it has RIHANNA and to see it go to his myspace page http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=47259791 Also doesnt meean if you heard the other side of the song with the pussycat dolls on youtube doesnt mean its true so stop trying changing the stuff that is really true —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.214.18 (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Not 4 Sale (Kardinal Offishall album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
Re-assessing on July 6 2008:
The article contains a relatively complete infobox (given available information; for instance, it obviously can't include reviews at the moment) and cover box. It has proper minimal categorisation. The lead section does include an overview of the album, but this is the only section of informative prose. In order to qualify for "B" class, the article will need additional informative sections. (See WP:ALBUM for ideas.) The track listing meets the "start" criteria, but it lacks the track lengths & composers necessary for "B" class. The article does not include a list of personnel, which is essential for "start" or better classes. To meet "start" class criteria, this list should include specifically members of the band. I'm not clear in this case how many people that would be, as I am unfamiliar with this musicians. To meet "B" class, the personnel section needs guest musicians & technical personnel, as well. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 12:50, 6 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 01:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Not 4 Sale (Kardinal Offishall album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080928211410/http://blogs.usatoday.com/listenup/2008/09/this-weeks-re-1.html to http://blogs.usatoday.com/listenup/2008/09/this-weeks-re-1.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080928211410/http://blogs.usatoday.com/listenup/2008/09/this-weeks-re-1.html to http://blogs.usatoday.com/listenup/2008/09/this-weeks-re-1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Start-Class Album articles
- WikiProject Albums articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Canadian music articles
- Low-importance Canadian music articles
- WikiProject Canadian music articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class Hip hop articles
- Low-importance Hip hop articles
- WikiProject Hip hop articles