Talk:North Carolina's congressional districts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) place(s).

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Mid-importance).

New map as of Feb 2016 bit.ly/21eGiPB

^ That link doesn't work any more. Here is the new one http://www.ncsbe.gov/webapps/redistrict/uscongmaps.html Edward Staplerhands (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page is incredibly confusing. Many of the district maps in the table for each distict are incorrect. It would seem more prudent to remove those images entirely and just have the map used at the top for the outline of the districts. This should also be reflected in the progression of districts table as well. Any thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.71.162.20 (talk) 18:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updating Needed

To echo the users above, this page has become outdated after the redistricting of 2016. The Elections of 2016 followed the new boundaries, not the ones showed here for each district. If someone knows how to update this, please do so. The first map encompassing the whole state is the correct one, it's the individual district maps that are outdated.

http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015E1/Bills/Senate/PDF/S2v4.pdf

http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015E1/Bills/House/PDF/H2v5.pdf

On June 2 2016 the courts upheld the new boundaries.

TomasMFC (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Alabama's congressional districts which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:17, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Further updating required

A new map for the 2020 elections has been put into place, as can be seen in this WFAE article, WFAE being a Charlotte-based radio and news station. These maps are expected to be used in 2020, and so the article and maps, as well as articles about each congressional district, need to be updated, as they have not been updated since 2018. Builder018 (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I second this request. Here is a link to the NC House bill (HB 1029 / SL 2019-249) adopting these districts. In the attached documents you will find a map of the districts. Here is a link to the Wake County Superior Court order setting aside an earlier injunction on congressional candidate filing and allowing the maps enacted in SL 2019-249 to go ahead. And here is a link to an article from policy watch summarizing the challenge. With that in mind, I will be adding a row to the table in Historical and present district boundaries to account for the new map which will be used for election year 2020. I will label year as 2019-2021 (since the map was adopted in 2019). If this is not proper format please feel free to correct. Iismitch55 (talk) 04:57, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upon closer examination, the year column seems to refer to the years served by the elected officials. So, the map adopted in 2019 will be used to elect officials who will serve from 2021-2023. Therefore, I will add the adopted map to this row instead of creating a new row. Iismitch55 (talk) 05:07, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]