Talk:New South Wales v Commonwealth (1990)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment
[edit]B class its well laid out I didnt find any significant gramatical errors. One thing though I was reading and it seamed to stop very abruptly as if something is missing. The importance of low is that as an Australian article its not overly significant, as an article to an Australian law project it would rate higher, even higher if the project focus was corporate or constitutional law. Gnangarra 10:32, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Also additional references. A section on the wider impact of the decision would enhance the article and the understanding. Gnangarra 10:37, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:New South Wales v Commonwealth (1990)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
This article was rated as B-class by Gnangarra on 10:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC) as it covers the subject completely and would be of value for general information. It needs to be expanded to incorporate a larger reference base. Importance was assessed as low for the WP Australia project as the subject is only example of the legal system at work. Gnangarra |
Last edited at 10:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 01:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- B-Class New South Wales articles
- Low-importance New South Wales articles
- WikiProject New South Wales articles
- B-Class Australian law articles
- Low-importance Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles