Talk:Neverware

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Neverware article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 3 July 2013 by reviewer Buffbills7701 (talk · contribs).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Google

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Neverwarecompany (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
ForrestRSmith (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Um, this sure reads more like a press release or corporate promo than it does a Wikipedia article. Perhaps a little less spin and a little more meat?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.225.213.146 (talk) 22:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I appreciate this pages approval and help revising it, but I do have a couple request.

First: The article title has been expanded from "Neverware" to "Neverware (software)". This change is inaccurate, as Neverware is a company which provides a service that includes hardware, software, and support. Can someone please fix that and move the page back to just "Neverware"?

Second: What changes, specifically, can be made to upgrade this article's standing from "starter"? I have made an effort to include as many sources as possible and write objectively based on their content. This article contains sources, content, and a formatting that I believe exceeds to the standards of the example Dirty Laundry (Bitter:Sweet song).

Neverwarecompany (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, none of this requires an admin; since admins are rather busy with tasks such as blocking vandal accounts, deleting spam articles or more complicated page moves, it's better not to ask for admin help when every experienced editor can help. Speaking of page moves, the article title has already been fixed by AJCham.

I wouldn't give that much about the "Start" rating; that's somewhat subjective. The article does lack many details on the company that I'd consider highly relevant, such as their revenues or the number of employees. It's hard to tell whether it's a couple of guys in a garage or a multi-million dollar company (or both). The "Awards and recognition" section could also do with some work: It's much less useful to say the company "was featured in X, Y and Z" than to summarize what X, Y and Z had to say about the company - not in a separate section, but integrated into the rest of the article. It's not as if "being written about in The New York Times" is the kind of information our readers will be looking for.

Finally, some minor style issues: References should come after the punctuation, and Wikipedia doesn't use title case, so the "recognition" in "Awards and recognition" should not be capitalized. I fixed that. Huon (talk) 05:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Credibility and balance?

Um, this sure reads more like a press release or corporate promo than it does a Wikipedia article. Perhaps a little less spin and a little more meat??

63.225.213.146 (talk) 22:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC) Barefoot Mike[reply]

Agreed ... it reads like a promo... from the very first sentence "provides a service" to "an old PC run like new". This is ad copy, not encyclopedic. Another example: "After a successful pilot program"...
IN RE the date errors in the references section: the only acceptable "all-numeric date format" is YYYY-MM-DD. Both characters of MM must be there, EG January is 01, etc. See: Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Citation_style.
Twang (talk) 22:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It STILL reads like a press release. Tyw7 (☎ Contact me! • Contributions) 22:42, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tried to fix this sounding like it was written by the subject. 92.238.50.216 (talk) 20:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Neverware. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]