Jump to content

Talk:Nauru reed warbler

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Nauru Reed Warbler)
Featured articleNauru reed warbler is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 25, 2015.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 7, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 2, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 28, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the Nauru Reed Warbler is found exclusively on the remote Pacific island of Nauru?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Nauru Reed Warbler/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 10:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oof, this will be like the apprentice teaching his master! The article looks good, and I have a few suggestions that could be taken or left. FunkMonk (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Damn, seems we were only two years away from this image[5] being in the public domain![6] FunkMonk (talk) 10:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this stamp could be used:[7] I'm not sure what the date is, though. FunkMonk (talk) 10:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that, seems it's from 1976. FunkMonk (talk) 10:45, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I had a good hard look for an image, but to no avail; it's something that may crop up in time, but I won't hold my breath! If we can find a Wikipedian in Nauru, I gather they're like sparrows over there... J Milburn (talk) 20:12, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the review- I'm particularly excited about the original description, which I searched for but somehow managed to miss. I'll be sure to go through that closely. I'll get to your comments at some point in the next couple of days. J Milburn (talk) 11:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now, for a potential FA, maybe permission should be asked for a picture somewhere... FunkMonk (talk) 00:37, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Thanks for your careful review. I do think that this one may have FA potential, but there a few little bits I want to work on first- trying to get hold of an image is certainly one of them! J Milburn (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

photo

[edit]

Yes, this article really needs a picture of its subject, as opposed to once-considered-same-species from elsewhere. There's even a picture of one on the $1.50 stamp series, so surely there are a number of non-copyrighted pix out there. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:02, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are stamps, yes, but who says they're non-copyrighted? FunkMonk (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've not been able to find any evidence that Nauru stamps are PD. I've spoken with Donald Buden, but he didn't have a photograph. He put me in touch with someone who had some, but she didn't send me one. No one who hasn't visited Nauru will have a picture, while I suspect that people from Nauru wouldn't have any reason to take a picture! I agree that it would be really valuable to have a picture, but I've not been able to get one, sadly. Josh Milburn (talk) 08:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations to all the contributors

[edit]

Wonderful article.

  Bfpage |leave a message  21:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Josh Milburn (talk) 08:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]