Jump to content

Talk:National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleNational Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc. was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 1, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 20, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 15, 2005.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that DC Comics sued Fawcett Comics in 1941 over Fawcett's Captain Marvel being a Superman rip-off, and the resulting National Comics Publications v. Fawcett Publications lawsuit took thirteen years to settle?
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review — delisted

[edit]

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. Unfortunately, as of September 20, 2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAC. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GA/R.

Ruslik 08:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The list of issues:

1) The article does cite its sources properly. It has only four inline citations that does not support all factual statements. Some fields in the template at the right are not filled.

2) The image [1] has a dispute regarding a copyright, i.e. its fair use rational is questionable. However I think the same arguments can be applied to other two images. Ruslik 08:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

[edit]

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project

[edit]

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 16:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc./Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Rating as per existing "Good Artice" tag. Imortance may need to be reviewed. — J Greb 01:35, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 08:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC). Substituted at 00:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)