Talk:Nakula

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nakula article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Hinduism: Krishnaism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as Mid-importance).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Post-War era

We seem to be missing info on the Pandavas after the war - trip to heaven and all that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.34.176 (talk) 08:50, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nakula Picture

The picture has been removed as the same picture was also present for sahadeva. The picture of nakula was cropped at the bottom and the name was deleted -Ankithreya! talk 11:52, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did Nakula really ride horses in the rain without getting wet?

This has been there in the article for while. On the Net, except for Alladi Sitaram's paper, I cannot find even a single mention of this myth. Similarly there is no reference even in the Mahabharata. I am removing this line now, but please add back if necessary with proper citations. Azhagiya manavalan (talk) 07:40, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV's in the article

This article is dumped with truck loads of POV's . I removed all the POV's and unsourced claims. Most of the article sentences is repeated multiple time and they are somewhat removed. The content is rearranged as per the order of appearance in the epic

Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 04:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The proper thing to do is to request a reference, not just delete it out of hand. Pinkfloyd11 (talk) 01:40, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Every editor in the wikipedia cannot go after other editors begging for refernces. If your info seems wrong and with no Ref or no Authentic Ref it will be challenged and removed. When it happens you dont simply revert the edits, provide Refs ,make consensus in Talk page if objects. Until unless no authentic refs the contents will remain removed, Better than misleading lots people!

Most info removed are repeated multiple times in the article itself. Contents are rearranged as per order of appearance. I am simply against the concept of adding analysis bcoz its simply POV of wiki editors. Most of them " contribute " to analysis with no Refe and authenticity. See WP:V

Arjunkrishna90 (talk) 03:38, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]