Talk:NHIndustries NH90
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the NHIndustries NH90 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"NH-90" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect NH-90. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 19#NH-90 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:36, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Removal of Norway NH-90 from operational history section
[edit]I have reinstated this info as just because Norway has cancelled it's order, does not mean that it does not have any operational history in Norway. It is therefore wrong to remove Norway from the operational history section Mortyman (talk) 23:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
MRH-90 Taipan split
[edit]It has not gone un-noticed that the article has gotten a bit large especially with the MRH-90 Taipan retirement, so its seemed like the time to break this off. The main article can focus on the ongoing developments of the NH90, and gives the Australian content some breathing room now that it is retired. A75 (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class aviation articles
- B-Class rotorcraft articles
- Rotorcraft task force articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles