Jump to content

Talk:My Man (Jade Ewen song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMy Man (Jade Ewen song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:My Man (Jade Ewen song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hahc21 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC) Hi again! I'll be reviewing this song. As it is pretty short, and the quality of the contributors is of great excellence, i'm confident i wont need more than 2 days to review this. --Hahc21 (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :) Till I Go Home (talk) 07:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1

[edit]

I've fixed some minor issues on the article. I'll be checking the references by Sunday. --Hahc21 (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2

[edit]

Again, i've read the article and fixed minor issues.

Composition
  • ""My Man" is a contemporary R&B song that also incorporates dance-pop elements."
  • And the reference?
Is at end of the next sentence I believe. Till I Go Home (talk) 09:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mmmm, the problem was that the link provided didn't covered the entire interview. On the entire interview, the "Sassy club banger" and cont. R&B statements are covered. I changed the link. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 14:01, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
References

Ok, the references are all OK. I have little doubts about two or three of the sources, but they all seem to be reliable.

--Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 03:03, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict

[edit]

Ok. I've read the article a dozen times and i don't find any other issues to be resolved by now.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Final comments: Another good job by Till I Go Home. Minor issues always appear, and as of now i think they're all well solved. Of course, i recommend to add an image on the composition section if possible, but it's just a comment!. Thanks. --Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 02:58, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Till I Go Home (talk) 03:02, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on My Man (Jade Ewen song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]