Jump to content

Talk:Muckaty Station

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Muckaty station)
Featured articleMuckaty Station is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 30, 2012.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 24, 2010Good article nomineeListed
August 12, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 22, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that after a search that has so far lasted 30 years, Muckaty station in Australia's Northern Territory is the only site being considered for a national radioactive waste facility?
Current status: Featured article

Sources

[edit]

Self published source

[edit]

The article includes an unpublished book chapter by David Nash. This is self published on his university's webpage. Nash, as his CV on that site shows, is a long-established linguist and was co-author of a report on the Muckaty Land Claim. In this context, simple facts about Muckaty reported by him can be taken as reliably sourced. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources checked

[edit]

Glen McLaren and William Cooper's history of the NT pastoral industry and Ted Ling's article on the 1930s inquiries have both been reviewed. Neither names Muckaty at all.hamiltonstone (talk) 03:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Map

[edit]

A map showing the location of this site would be very useful. Even latitude and longitude would be helpful. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2010 (UTC) checkY done Hughesdarren (talk) 01:01, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

The three images are seemingly the most boring possible. Is it possible to add more interesting ones? If it's quite barren and undeveloped then pictures of animals is an option. Oneplus1 (talk) 03:05, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Muckaty Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Muckaty Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

as of 2017

[edit]

So, Muckaty station is no longer being considered as a potential radioactive waste dump, and some of the traditional owners are suing the Northern Lands Council about it. I don't know how to best update this article and am interested in suggestions. Cheers Knittea (talk) 11:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Muckaty Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]