Jump to content

Talk:Motte-and-bailey castle/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Harrison49 (talk) 21:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Angevins redirects to House of Anjou - which of these on the disambiguation page is the correct one?
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
    The article is well referenced.
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
    The article covers the main aspects.
  3. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    The article maintains a neutral point of view.
  4. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    The article does not appear to be subject to any edit warring.
  5. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Images are used effectively.
  6. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    A very interesting article and a good read. Harrison49 (talk) 15:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]