Talk:Monetary Policy Committee (United Kingdom)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 15:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Image complies to fair use requirements.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments:
- Numbers over nine should be written numerically, and up to nine, written out. E.g. It comprises 8 members, only 5 days, 2 years, etc.
- Hyphens are used instead of dashes, see WP:DASH.
- There are some low-level grammar issues like "most commonly via the setting the rate". Check for other similar issues.
- Perhaps the former members section could be in two columns.
Summary: There are just some small minor issues that need to be addressed before it can be passed as a Good Article. I will allow up to seven days for these issues to be fixed.
Final summary: Thank you so much for all your hard work in helping make this a better article. I have split the membership section into two columns, I feel that it looks neater this way. If you disagree, you may change it back. I am now confident that this article meets all the requirements for a Good Article and I am happy to pass it. Well done! -- S Masters (talk) 06:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)