Talk:MetCC

MetCC was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 31, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
January 2, 2010	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes.

Untitled

Even though it's not likely to be of interest to many, I've given Metcall/C3I a page of its own rather than further expand the main Metropolitan Police Service or Central Operations page. The C3I programme is the biggest change in the MPS for some years (and 2006's structural changes mean Metcall is now the biggest OCU in the Met); it seemed to make more sense to give it its own page (and a subsidiary page on the new and expanded role of Cad operators, now that the role is a separate position in its own right, rather than a primarily police officer-staffed post supplemented by civilian staff) instead of trying to shoehorn them into the existing article. Furthermore, Metcall is likely to be Ian Blair's most significant operational legacy so is likely to be of historical interest in future.

The page is photo-less as the MPS don't want to release any external shots that could identify the Metcall centres (their own website admits that the locations are Hendon, Bow & Lambeth, but the exact addresses aren't in the public domain), and the MPS will not release any photos of even the insides of the buildings into the public domain. (Should anyone really care, the MPS has released photos of Wimbledon Police Station's old Cad Room and Traffic Control; Traffic in particular has a very similar layout to Metcall inside.) Iridescent 21:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Apologies for the multiple minor edits to this since it's creation! After I decided to separate out the description of the post of Cad Operator and of the Contact Handling System into separate articles, this one needed quite a bit of tweaking to avoid duplication between the articles. Iridescent 00:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Opening line

I'm confused by whether it's incorrectly or correctly known as C3I. If it's incorrectly known by this name, perhaps we should say why, or what leads to the confusion. Interesting article though. Escaper7 13:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, although the MPS policy on this seems to change day-by-day. At the moment they seem to be using 'Metcall' on all their internal communications relating only to the three call centres, 'C3I' for internal use when describing the whole programme of revamping CO10, and 'The C3I programme' on all their external publicity (enter the terms 'Metcall' and 'C3I' on their own websites search engine and you'll see how confusing this is - even their own press office don't seem to have made their minds up). I've rewritten the article slightly to clarify this, although to be honest the policy seems to change all the time. Iridescent 22:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge & rewrite plus racial bias allegation

In order to break up a pointless walled garden, I've merged Contact Handling System and CAD Operator into this article. I've also completely rewritten (and re-sourced) the section on staffing. While the section I've added on allegations of racial bias is bound to be controversial, I've sourced it very carefully to make sure it's neutral and accurate. - iridescent (talk to me!) 16:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

As the locations of the buildings are secret, and the MPS doesn't release any photos into the public domain (there are a couple of photos of the inside of the centre in back-issues of MPS internal magazines, notably The Job), this article is necessarily short of illustrations. The address of one of the buildings has made it into the public domain (see the image page), so I've taken a photo of that particular building. While I agree the page looks a bit sparse, I don't see a need for more illustrations (even if sourceable), unless someone can find a public domain photo of the CHS system in use (unlikely) — iridescent (talk to me!) 02:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of May 31, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: Pass - much improved!

2. Factually accurate?: Pass All sources are formatted correctly and are reliabe, no original research

3. Broad in coverage?: Pass

4. Neutral point of view?: Pass

5. Article stability? Pass

6. Images?: Pass

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status.

Kindest Regards:
The Sunshine Man 20:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

In police terms what is Metronet? Is it something to do with Metcall? I know that Metronet is the name for the maintenance company that looks after parts of the underground, and also will Metcall be part of the proposed network to allow pan-emergency services comms? Thanks in advance. Escaper2007 11:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not something I've ever heard of in any context other than the (now defunct) railway maintenance company. The pan-emergency services comms network already exists and is called TETRA or Airwave depending on where you are (mostly Airwave in the UK and TETRA elsewhere, but that's not hard and fast). The Met Police's computer network is called AWARE and I've not heard of any plans to change the name. Can't think what else it could refer to (MetroComm, a section of Traffic Control, is the only thing I can think of in the MPS with a similar name). — iridescent (talk to me!) 17:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MetroComm - that's it, thanks very much... nothing to do with Metcall, but thanks for clearing that up. Escaper27 14:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Internal/External name

The article says "Generally, the term 'Metcall' is used internally whilst the term 'C3i' is used externally, although this is not a hard-and-fast rule."

This sounds backwards. Is it?

If this really is how the terms are used, then some explanation may be in order. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Audry2 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's correct - it's called "Metcall" on internal communications, and "C3i" on press releases, the MPS website etc. Not sure how that's unclear, or could be made clearer on the lead paragraph. At some point, the "external" name is due to formally change to "Central Communications Command" - however, since that will still inherit the "C3" aspect from the former "Command, Control & Communications" I assume the C3i name will continue to be used. — iridescent (talk to me!) 17:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up the lead slightly to try to clarify the usage. — iridescent (talk to me!) 17:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

(Crosspost from User talk:82.26.196.20)
Please don't keep re-adding the material to the lead of Central Communications Command. I don't care what the internal Met Police terminology is, and nor do our readers, none of whom should be expected to know what a "Cad Room" is - which at any rate is covered later in the article. In addition, you are adding misformatted references to unreliable sources. – iride scent 18:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Official website?

It's unclear to me what, if any, website could be considered an official website to be included per WP:ELYES. If there is one, it should be the first one listed and clearly labeled. --Ronz (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't one; this is a secret programme. All official information was sourced from either FOIA-released documents or press coverage. The closest thing to an "offical" site would be the Met Police Service and the Metropolitan Police Authority websites (which you've just removed the links to as "off topic") but the CCC has no subpage of its own there; you can glean proof of its existence through searching for "Central Communications Command" in their search bar (which brings up assorted job adverts for work in the CCC, mentions of the CCC in internal reports which have been released, etc) but the MPS still refuse to admit officially that CCC exists or to provide any details of it. – iride scent 14:19, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on Central Communications Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Central Communications Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927233340/http://www.met.police.uk/traffic/images/Control-Room-2LARGE.jpg to http://www.met.police.uk/traffic/images/Control-Room-2LARGE.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Central Communications Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]