IMHO, Maybe Baby should either point to the 1958 Crickets' song, from which the film takes its title, or a disambiguation page. Linuxlad (talk) 10:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
I asked Technical 13 for a way please for the first time the coding is added to a page in main article space, for it to be commented-out, and not display the ugly placeholder text to readers. That way, the first time the bot edits the page, it will show useful info, instead of having a placeholder sit there for over one week, or more. Technical 13 has not responded yet to this idea.
Until such time as this placeholder text can be commented-out and still work for the bot, I don't think it should be in main article space, as it serves no purpose for our readers.
My above discussion section was immediately closed down by Technical 13 (talk·contribs), which effectively modified my talk page comments without my permission diff.
This is inappropriate.
My comments were unaddressed, still are unaddressed, and I have not been asked nor given permission for anyone to modify my comments.
I'm afraid I don't need your permission to close a discussion about a moot point. Please don't revert me again on these grounds as I see it as BATTLEGROUND and it implies to me that you are NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. There is no ugly placeholder on the page, I've already taken care of it and if you had given me two minutes before crying about it on the talk page, you would have seen that your request was already completed. Coding these things takes a little time (usually a few minutes to a few hours), so the other fix to the template itself will take me a little longer to add another output to the template. Please... Be patient. Any further combative actions by you here will result in a trip to DRN because I really don't want to deal much with it. Thanks! Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}}(t • e • c)21:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I won't revert your edit more than once. However I maintain it is inappropriate to unilaterally collapse someone else's comments on a talk page. You are the only other party to this argument. Therefore you are biased. Therefore you should not collapse my comments. It is blatantly biased and inappropriate. But I won't uncollapse my comments again. — Cirt (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously it seems most unfortunately that the above user will collapse talk page discussions himself if he finds their contents disagreeable to him. So I will chose to disengage from this article page and its discussion page. I emphasize again it is inappropriate to collapse discussion sections of other users, especially those one is in disagreement with at the exact moment of the disagreement! Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
