Talk:Scuba manifold

Photograph of manifold

Photographic image of tanks with manifold and hoses is needed, the one that has no copyright problems. Michagal 16:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

B-class review

B

The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{cite web}} is optional. Looks OK to me. Y The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing. Looks OK to me. Y The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind. Looks OK to me. Y The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously. Looks OK to me. Y The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content. Adequately illustrated. Y The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. It is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible. Although Wikipedia is more than just a general encyclopedia, the article should not assume unnecessary technical background and technical terms should be explained or avoided where possible. Looks OK to me. Y

Looks compliant with requirements. There are a few uncited points, but mostly fairly obvious stuff, and nothing I would consider controversial. Promoting to B-class. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 09:20, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Name change proposed

I recommend a name change to Scuba manifold which is more precise and avoids ambiguity altogether. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Decided to just do it. If there are any objections, discuss here. Cheers. • • • Peter (Southwood) ^(talk): 08:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)