Talk:Lunar year

Merge?

should probably be merged with lunar calendar. dab (ᛏ) 08:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. Would the articles Year and Calendar be merged? I doubt. --Spring Dennis 06:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another possibility is to merge with Month. Lunokhod 22:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Lunar year with Lunar calendar

Dbachmann has proposed that Lunar year be merged with Lunar calendar. Please give your opinions below.

not for any fundamental reason, just because the articles are similar in scope and both very short; if they should grow in size significantly, they can always be separated again. No big deal as far as I am concerned. dab (𒁳) 13:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

for the record, I had completely overlooked the fact that I had made the same proposal before, back in July 2005, just above. dab (𒁳) 20:55, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For (weak): I support this proposal for the following reasons. First, at the present time, it is not clear to me how the lunar year stub will ever be exapanded to a full article. Second, the lunar year and lunar calendar are definitely related, and it doesn't seem too logical to discuss the lunar calendar without discussing the lunar year. Finally, I think that the merged article would be more informative. Nevertheless, If the lunar year and lunar calendar topics ever are expanded to the point where a division into two articles is warranted, I would also be for such a re-division. Lunokhod 15:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - The two articles cover material that is similar enough that they should be merged together. Dr. Submillimeter 17:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge: the two concepts are closely related to each other and it's somewhat strange that lunar calendar doesn't mention lunar years in the text. Tocharianne 17:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]