Talk:Lovechild (album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lovechild (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements for

Start-Class criteria:
Y An infobox.
Y A lead section giving an overview of the album.
Y A track listing.
Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name.
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year.

C-Class criteria:
Y All of Start class criteria.
Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art.
N At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section).
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs.
Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.
N A casual reader should learn something about the album.

B-Class criteria:
N All of B-Class criteria.
Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details.
Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians.
N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS.

Cdl obelix (talk) 21:54, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 13:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 22:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lovechild (Curved Air album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090901202221/http://www.curvedair.com/Directions.htm to http://www.curvedair.com/Directions.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]