Talk:Lockheed XF-104 Starfighter/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   What makes Ejectionsite.com a reliable source? Is Kevin Coyne a noted expert on the subject (i.e., has his work been published in reliable sources elsewhere)?

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   The article is in great shape, excellent work! The only thing holding up promotion is whether Ejectionsite.com is a reliable source or not. Parsecboy (talk) 20:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

   Website has been removed, so passing for GA. Parsecboy (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)