Talk:List of Syriac Orthodox patriarchs of Antioch

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Oriental O. / Syriac Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Oriental Orthodoxy (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is within the scope of the Syriac Christianity work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Assyria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Patriarchs of Tur-Abdin

Are there any sources that provide a list of the Patriarchs of Tur-Abdin, which was an autocephalic patriarchate that split from that of Antioch in 1364, and reunited in 1869. This is an important piece of data, mentioned in: Massacres, resistance, protectors by David Gaunt, Jan Bet̲-Şawoce, Racho Donef. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.16.231.150 (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I'll add them into my template Patriarchs of the Syriac Orthodox Church shortly.

Djwilms (talk) 07:19, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

Djwilms (talk) 01:54, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Syriac Orthodox Patriarchs of Antioch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050326133816/http://www.yauno.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=237 to http://www.yauno.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=237

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

It has been suggested since July 2019 to merge List of Syriac Patriarchs of Antioch from 512 to 1783 to the List of Syriac Orthodox Patriarchs of Antioch making it one continuum of Syriac Patriarchs.

Strongly Oppose: I see this merger is a logical to establish a continuum of Syriac Orthodox Patriarchs. But the problem is that prior to 1783 it was known as Syriac Patriarch of Antioch. It was only after the split of 1783 that the title was claimed by both the Syriac Orthodox Church and the Syriac Catholic Church. So in a way, the List of Syriac Patriarchs of Antioch from 512 to 1783 is what both aforementioned (Orthodox and Catholic) churches recognize, whereas the List of Syriac Orthodox Patriarchs of Antioch is for the Orthodox church only. The titles of the articles are chosen carefully as well to differentiate. The first list uses the term "Syriac Patriarchs of Antioch" (WITHOUT the Orthodox tag) whereas the other list uses the term "Syriac Orthodox Patriarchs of Antioch" (that is WITH the Orthodox tag), the clearest indication why the two lists should not be merged. werldwayd (talk) 03:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Counting them, for instance those named Ignatius

Ignatius I can be counted as II if 1st-to-2nd-century Ignatius of Antioch is counted as I, so I added notes to II, III and IV about this ("sometimes add 1"), but stopped at number IV, and there are MANY more by this name until today (pls add notes if you KNOW it's needed).

It can also work the other way round: of III (who can become IV) I know for a fact he's being mentioned as II (came across it on Bar Hebraeus page), unless it was just careless editing by someone. So the same man can appear as either Ignatius II, III, or IV!

I don't know if this mess with Ignatius propagates throughout the long list until today. It is also the case with other names, as I noticed glancing at the "Notes". I've never, ever seen a list with literally DOZENS of notes, all about this same problem. Are the numbers really in wide circulation? Any common standards or solutions, such as a table, algorithm, adding birth names, patronyms or surnames? The list is NOT a practical tool as it is now! On the Bar Hebraeus page, the formally correct Wikilink led to a man who lived 4 centuries too early! Arminden (talk) 17:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mugsalot: hi. Did you read this here? Arminden (talk) 22:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did. The article is entirely sourced. Please provide sources for your edits. Mugsalot (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]