Jump to content

Talk:List of presidents of the United States

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured listList of presidents of the United States is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 15, 2005Featured list candidatePromoted
October 30, 2008Featured list removal candidateDemoted
June 26, 2009Featured list candidateNot promoted
March 3, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
September 9, 2022Featured list candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured list

Biden & Trump portrait crops[edit]

Why do the Biden and Trump entries use extremely close crops of their portraits, when all other recent presidents are represented by their uncropped official portraits? We should probably stick to the uncropped official portraits for Biden and Trump, or switch to super narrow crops for all the other recent presidents, rather than the current arbitrary switch. Unless there's some good reason for this inconsistency? ∴ ZX95 [discuss] 00:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Presidential Numbering: Biden is NOT the 46th President of the United States[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


If this has been discussed before, please direct me to the proper discussion.

This is a discussion that affects many pages, but this felt like the most central place to discuss it.

The way we do presidential numbering is simply wrong. For example, the sentence "Joe Biden is the 46th President of the United States" is just objectively incorrect. He is the 45th president. He is the 45th person to serve as president, therefore he is the 45th president. That's what those words mean. There is no other way to interpret that. You can get away with saying something like "Joe Biden is president number 46" or "Joe Biden served the 46th presidency of the United States" because they refer to more abstract concepts like presidencies, but if you say "46th president" that is referring to presidents, who are PEOPLE. There have only been 45 PEOPLE who were president of the US, so the numbering CANNOT go above 45. Grover Cleveland is not two people! Finnigami (talk) 18:55, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grover Cleveland served two presidencies..source .Moxy- 21:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm well aware of that fact, which should be clear from the last sentence of my post, "Grover Cleveland is not two people!" The point remains that though they may have been 46 "presidencies" so far (although honestly it also seems arbitrary to me that two terms dont count as two presidencies if they're sequential, but that's beside the point in this case) there have certainly not been 46 presidents, because each president is a person and there have only been 45 people who have been president! Finnigami (talk) 06:23, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of how right you think you are, surely you can recognize that the vast, vast, vast, vast, vast majority of sources refer to Biden as the 46th. You need substantial evidence to counter something like that, and logic alone is insufficient. --Golbez (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, unfortunately I may have put this topic in the wrong place. There are two different ways to talk about such things. The way this article talks about it, in terms of providing abstract "numbering" for presidents, is technically correct and falls within convention. HOWEVER, the statements used in other articles, such as "Joe Biden is the 46th President of the United States" are simply, objectively, categorically incorrect. Finnigami (talk) 06:21, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"HOWEVER, the statements used in other articles, such as "Joe Biden is the 46th President of the United States" are simply, objectively, categorically incorrect." And the vast, vast, vast, vast majority of sources disagree with you. We need more than "Finnigami's logic" to overturn that, regardless of how right you might be. If this is a fight you want to wager, godspeed, but this isn't the place to do it. --Golbez (talk) 14:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the sources agree with me, 100%. They all agree on the order of presidents, and who was who. And they all agree that there have been 45 total presidents. Finnigami (talk) 16:53, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cleveland is counted as the 22nd & 24th president, due to having served non-consecutive terms. GoodDay (talk) 03:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm well aware of that fact, which should be clear from the last sentence of my post, "Grover Cleveland is not two people!" The point remains that though they may have been 46 "presidencies" so far (although honestly it also seems arbitrary to me that two terms dont count as two presidencies if they're sequential, but that's beside the point in this case) there have certainly not been 46 presidents, because each president is a person and there have only been 45 people who have been president! I'll say it again: Grover Cleveland is not two people! Finnigami (talk) 06:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You're wasting time on this, TBH. Should you doubt my word? Open this discussion up at Joe Biden's talkpage & see how it goes. GoodDay (talk) 16:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To me it seems rather silly to suggest that because a discussion will most likely have a certain conclusion, that the discussion isn't even worth having. Finnigami (talk) 16:59, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO, you're wasting editors' time. GoodDay (talk) 17:02, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just because you don't agree with something doesn't mean its a waste of time to even discuss. That is a very dismissive view of other editor's inputs. Finnigami (talk) 17:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
While we're at it, Yellow Corporation's trucks were actually orange. Therefore the article should be renamed "Orange Corporation"...I guess? Woko Sapien (talk) 16:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On the contrary, an accurate analogy would be to say that, even though the same of the company is "Yellow Corporation," the article should say that the trucks are orange. Which it should. That is what I am arguing for: that the article should describe reality, rather than simply aligning with an inaccurate tradition. But what you are insisting is analogous to changing the article to say that the trucks are yellow, even though they are orange, simply because of the standard official name "Yellow Corporation". Thank you for providin this illuminating analogy that supports my argument! Finnigami (talk) 16:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And this article already clarifies that incongruity perfectly well:
Since the office was established in 1789, 45 men have served in 46 presidencies...Grover Cleveland served two non-consecutive terms and is therefore counted as the 22nd and 24th president of the United States, giving rise to the discrepancy between the number of presidencies and the number of individuals who have served as president.
I think GoodDay said it best, make a formal proposal if you feel that strongly about it. Otherwise, this isn't a constructive debate. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing any possibility of a consensus forming for what's being proposed. Recommend (per WP:NOTFORUM) that this discussion be closed down. GoodDay (talk) 07:01, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Woko Sapien (talk) 17:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Using two images for Grover Cleveland[edit]

I find it a bit odd that the same image used for Cleveland's non-consecutive terms. Surely we can find one image from his first term and another image from his second and use both respectively instead of just one image. I expect this to be the case in the scenario if Trump is re-elected in 2024 as well.

Maybe use this for the first term and the current for the second term?

HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 18:59, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery in the lead[edit]

Per List of prime ministers of the United Kingdom, I've added this gallery of four notable presidents to the lead of the article, which fits this article better than an image of the White House. I am establishing a consensus here to see what others think, but the gallery option seems to be preferred elsewhere (e.g. the list of UK PMs article). ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter (talk) 14:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whether to include such a gallery requires consensus here first, as would a consensus concerning which presidents to include in it. Drdpw (talk) 18:52, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that would be the best thing to do, which is why I took it to the talk page as well. So to begin, if a consensus is reached, which presidents should be used? --ThingsCanOnlyGetWetter (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
First, how about we answer the question, Do we wish to change from a single article-top image, currently the north side of the White House, to a gallery of multiple U.S. presidents? Drdpw (talk) 19:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]