Talk:List of highest-grossing Philippine films

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Film: Southeast Asian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Filipino films with at least a hundred million peso box office gross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/entertainment/01/08/13/sisterakas-phs-highest-grossing-local-film

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

well the gross of the movies under the 100million mark dont look accurate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.105.224.174 (talk) 02:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of highest-grossing Filipino films of all time. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Maid in Malacañang

Why y'all removing Maid in Malacañang in this page. Wheather you like it or not, it reached 750 Million and you cannot do anything about it Haluuu the universe (talk) 23:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the source and the entry from the meantime until we reach concensus if we should include it on the list. Bandera is an editorial tabloid, which is clearly an unreliable source. Bandera mentioned Darryl Yap as a source, and Darryl Yap himself, mentioned Wikipedia as his own source. This is a clear example of circular reporting (like what happened to the Alan McMasters article, that claimed to be the inventor of the oven toaster, and news sites citing Wikipedia as a source, but it turns out it was a prank) I always want to maintain neutral point of view and this is in no way made with any political motive, I believe Wikipedia takes this certain matter seriously for it's credibility, so discussion on the talk page is needed.

Another reason is since it's an unverifiable claim, the IMDBPro analytics (although it's not reliable too but has no conflict of interest because it didn't come from the producer or director itself) states that the film grossed $500,000 worldwide.–A 6397 ^{T A L K!} 17:28, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manila Bulletin is already a reliable source right?[1]https://mb.com.ph/2023/02/11/darryl-yap-on-martyr-or-murderer-box-office-success-is-a-matter-of-destiny/ Loibird90 (talk) 02:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes, it is 112.211.72.215 (talk) 15:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because that is the same press conference where Darryl Yap mentioned Wikipedia as it's source so the information is not reliable. Besides, the article is a promotional article because the author is a PR strategist according to her LinkedIn profile, all of her written articles in Manila Bulettin are paid to be published for promotional purposes. -–A 6397 ^{T A L K!} 15:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Angelo6397 my reference was from manila bulletin, which is a reliable filipino newspaper publisher. Haluuu the universe (talk) 15:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Wikipedia, paid promotional content can't be used as a reliable source. Even Forbes, a deemed reliable source posts promotional articles. -–A 6397 ^{T A L K!} 15:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Angelo6397 https://g.co/kgs/95PQ2VN is this reliable or not? Haluuu the universe (talk) 15:47, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Google search result is not a reliable source as it reflects the Wikipedia article of the film, I am not removing the figures on the article of the film but on this list, the best scenario is to leave it as it is because there are no official sources aside from Darryl Yap himself that shows that amount. Even PEP.ph is sketchy about the said figures, [2], it said "kumita umano" or "allegedly earned". The IMDBpro website only tallied 27 million PHP, and that was data directly from the cinemas. I am reverting your edit without any political motives. I just wanted to make sure that the list provides accurate information, the data from the article itself can stay that way. –A 6397 ^{T A L K!} 16:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have a reliable source that will support the ₱750 million claim, yet you keep adding that movie on the list. I will report you if you don't stop vandalizing the article. Kenquenito (talk) 09:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 February 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Previously, part of this list is the Maid in Malacanang which has a gross of 600 million plus. However, in its current list it has been omitted. I don’t know if it was done on purpose or was accidentally removed. In whatever case I hope this list will be corrected and be edited based on facts and not biases.

May ‘fake news’ be obliterated starting with owns principles. No to double standard. 119.94.170.222 (talk) 00:55, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 19:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 20 November 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please remove the Hows of Us from the 1 Billion Mark as references clearly show that Hello Love Goodbye surpassed the movie on its release. This was clearly reported by the ABS-CBN News. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzdP-zH1wEU - https://news.abs-cbn.com/entertainment/09/03/19/hello-love-goodbye-makes-history-as-highest-grossing-ph-film-of-all-time Hrocampo (talk) 02:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: There is no 1 billion listed, and why would one remove one movie from a list just because another movie made more money? In future, please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:08, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]