Jump to content

Talk:Life in Cartoon Motion

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The song track "Relax, Take It Easy" should not be named like "Relax (Take it Easy)"? that is wou it is on the back case of the CD.

Fair use rationale for Image:Mika-Lifeincartoonmotion.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mika-Lifeincartoonmotion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hate fair use natzis stupid and pointless dribble. If something is not fair use, delete it, if it is than YOU add the rational. TrevorLSciAct 16:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC) ps, I know it's a bot, and that only makes it worse, wikipedia has become overrun by policy[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mika-Lifeincartoonmotion.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mika-Lifeincartoonmotion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:43, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Life in Cartoon Motion/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Green tickY A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  • Green tickY Categorisation at least by artist and year
  • Green tickY A casual reader should learn something about the album.
Alright article but there are far far too many reviews in the infobox. WP:Albums says to list only 10. Also the review section is very very biased as this album received an extremely large amount of negative press. Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)