Talk:Daman and Diu Portuguese Creole

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daman and Diu Portuguese Creole article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in December 2020.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Untitled

The discussion on whether Gujarati is or is not, the substrate language for Lingua da Casa is at present located on the Talk:Portuguese_Creole page. Perhaps it needs to be moved here? Regards. WikiSceptic 09:21, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any sort of sourcing for that info? I've been defending it, but I'd imagine that User:Sarcelles do a better job than me since he seems to have come up with it. Aren't creoles supposed to have more than one substrate language? AEuSoes1 18:03, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

1. I believe that I may probably know better than Sarcelles about this matter; 2. I was thinking that my compromise wording is a sufficient compromise of this question; 3. Looked up Sarcelles' talk page, and am not impressed by his expertize or lack of it, for this is the only user talk page that I have found with so many complaints and even exasperated threats to resort to arbitration, etc. Why can't we leave the text with the compromise I have proposed? WikiSceptic 10:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daman and Diu Portuguese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141223164949/http://schuchardt.uni-graz.at/werk/online/772 to http://schuchardt.uni-graz.at/werk/online/772

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]