Talk:Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome.
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Kohlschütter–Tönz syndrome.
|
![]() | This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
note
[edit]- Quality of Information: 2
- Article size: 2
- Readability: 2 *Gets pretty technical in Gene Mutations sections, consider adding in sentences so layperson can read it.
- Refs: 2
- Links: 2
- Responsive to comments: 2 *No comments on page yet.
- Formatting: 1 *Change the types of brain imaging (MRI and EEG) to be subsections of Brain Imaging
- Writing: 1 *There were sections in the draft from November 18 with weird wording - the Related Gene Mutations specifically.
- Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
- Outstanding?: 2
Article was extremely interesting and well-written, there was no added media (pics, videos) so consider adding in for the final Wikipedia article.
_______________
Total: 18 out of 20
Reviewed by KelseyGratton (talk) 21:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
1. Quality of Information: 2
2. Article size: 2
3. Readability: 2
4. Refs: 2
5. Links: 1, I think you could add more links to other wikipedia pages to direct readers to more detailed explanations.
6. Responsive to comments: 2
7. Formatting: 2
8. Writing: 2, some grammatical errors but I like that you added short explanations to a word that could be confusing or unknown to readers.
9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
10. Outstanding?: 2, Pictures would be a nice addition! And do you know anything about the prognosis of this syndrome?
_______________
Total: 19 out of 20
AshleyHardy (talk) 20:58, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
- Quality of Information: 2
- Article size: 2 (~15,300)
- Readability: 2
- Refs: 2 (several recent articles linked)
- Links: 1
There are some other wikipedia links used; however, I think if more pages were linked, the reader would better understand the article.
- Responsive to comments: 1
Been over 5 days since first review and no response.
- Formatting: 2 (followed wikipedia formatting)
- Writing: 1
Just make sure to proofread. One heading is messed up (Splice-Site Muation) and there are other minor grammatical errors.
- Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
- Outstanding?: 1
Once it is proofread and more links are added, you will be golden!
Total: 16 out of 20 Allison gainer (talk) 15:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the comments. I made some final edits (spelling and grammar fixes and some coding adjustments with headings) as well as adding some clarification along with more linked pages. Let me know if you see anything else. Kathleen Heller (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
- C-Class Molecular Biology articles
- Unknown-importance Molecular Biology articles
- C-Class Genetics articles
- Low-importance Genetics articles
- WikiProject Genetics articles
- All WikiProject Molecular Biology pages
- C-Class Epilepsy articles
- Low-importance Epilepsy articles
- WikiProject Epilepsy articles
- C-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- C-Class medical genetics articles
- Mid-importance medical genetics articles
- Medical genetics task force articles
- C-Class neurology articles
- Mid-importance neurology articles
- Neurology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages