Talk:Katteni Kaizō

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Deleted the ending from the information. I do not think it is necesary to spoil the ending right away. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximilianjenus (talk • contribs) 23:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The section says "Ending" in big letters. If you don't want to know the ending, don't read the section marked "Ending."

On the other hand, is this actually the ending? I haven't read that far, and don't know for sure.

And why have it there at all? If he has made references to it in later series, then the ending should be discussed in that context - sourced. Without any discussion about it at all, I'm not really sure why it is there. We need to discuss the real world impact of the ending, or it's just a random bit of summary that serves no real purpose. Doceirias (talk) 05:57, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested, you can always read it up on the kumeta wiki http://wiki.kumetan.net/ Whenever he made reference to "dream ending" in Zetsubou Sensei he is referring to this manga, although a more obvious reference is in the end one of the Zetsubou tankoubon where he responds to calls that "Katte ni Kaizō should be animated instead." I have too many things to do, and no time. _dk (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just your opinion then. Making fun of dream endings is pretty universal, frankly. Doceirias (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Romanized name

The official romanization of the name is "Katteni Kaizo" without the space between "Katte" and "ni" . It is written as such on the backcover of the japanese volumes. Anime News Network also has it's article without that space. I tried to move it to this romanization stating this reason for the move but it was almost immediately reverted. Can please someone tell me how the official romanization can be preempted and why this article isn't named the same as the official romanization? Chaosof99 (talk) 19:44, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left a few links on your talk page to explain it; removing the space between a noun and a particle is a romanization practice not followed by Wikipedia's standards of romanization, and one I believe would normally be ignored in the same way we romanize Shijo as Shijō and not Shijyo or or Shijou. Wikipedia uses Hepburn romanization unless there is overwhelming evidence that the unorthodox romanization would be more recognized. In the case of an untranslated, relatively obscure manga, a redirect is probably enough. Doceirias (talk) 20:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]