Talk:Kan Ekʼ

A fact from Kan Ekʼ appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 December 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the royal Maya name Kan Ek', first recorded in the ninth century, was the name given to all of the Itza kings of central Petén?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kan Ek'.

Wikipedia

Mesoamerica (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mesoamerica, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MesoamericaWikipedia:WikiProject MesoamericaTemplate:WikiProject MesoamericaMesoamerica articles

Guatemala Low‑importance

	Guatemala portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Guatemala, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Guatemala on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GuatemalaWikipedia:WikiProject GuatemalaTemplate:WikiProject GuatemalaGuatemala articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Gratuitous feedback

The earliest known use of the title comes from a Maya stelae - shouldn't that be "stela"? Also would look better as "Mayan" (adjective) I think.....Casliber (talk · contribs) 05:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are alot of Kan Ek names in the History section....

Thanks for looking at this... The "stelae" is a typo, but "Mayan" is more correctly used of languages while "Maya" is used as an adjective to describe everything else - see for example Sharer and Traxler 2006, in "A note on names, orthography and pronunciation" on p.xxxiii: ...the term "Maya" is used as a noun to refer to the Maya people, ancient and modern, and as an adjective, as in "Maya books,", "Maya pottery," or "Maya writing." When referring to languages, however, it is customary to use the term "Mayan," as in "the Mayan languages. - this is pretty much standard usage in the academic press. Simon Burchell (talk) 08:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've just re-read the History section intro and it was a bit jarring with the repeat use of the name. I've cut a couple of instances. Simon Burchell (talk) 09:06, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kan Ek'. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090318030422/http://www.asociaciontikal.com/pdf/60.99_-_Foias.pdf to http://www.asociaciontikal.com/pdf/60.99_-_Foias.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]