Jump to content

Talk:Kambakkht Ishq

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Kambakth Ishq)

Hollywood Stars

[edit]

I am not sure if the Hollywood stars are playing themselves, I saw a trailer in which Sylvester says his name is something else, but I could be mistaken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chillzzzin (talkcontribs) 04:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

release date

[edit]

Where are all these dates coming from? we need a reliable source before accepting them --Maurice45 (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Movie Reception

[edit]

I think time to add Movie Reception... and Mind you ... it must be unbiased one. Critics pointed it a Thumbs down except Taran Adarash from Bollywoodhangama.com So and unbiased Reception cap would be great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.13.64 (talk) 18:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Picturised

[edit]

In the soundtrack the word "Picturised" is used and although I was able to find a fairly obvious and redundant literal explanation of the word in the dictionary I cannot understand what it really means in this context. Is this a special phrase used in India, is it some special term referring to music videos? As a native English speaker unfamiliar with Indian culture I'm hoping someone can rephrase this into more neutral international English easier for readers to understand or if means something very special in a specific context make it into a link that gives readers the necessary context to explain what it means. -- Horkana (talk) 18:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bollywood#Bollywood_song_and_dance "If the hero and heroine dance and sing a pas de deux, it is often staged in beautiful natural surroundings or architecturally grand settings. This staging is referred to as a "picturisation"."
So I eventually managed to find an explanation, but it still seems very strange to mention the staging of the video/scene in a section describing the soundtrack album. -- Horkana (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio tag

[edit]

The synopsis posted here was taken verbatim from the "Script" page of official movie site, and in addition to being a copyright violation was a hype-y, blurby WP:TONE vio. Tenebrae --(talk) 23:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the section completely instead of placing the copyvio tag.--Managerarc(talk) 22:12, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure I understand. I removed the questionable text when I put in the tag. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:50, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://kambakkhtishq.erosentertainment.com/index2.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. — Cactus Writer (talk) 06:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kambakkht Ishq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kambakkht Ishq/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

"The film received extremely negative reviews from critics.[4]"? The cited reference says nothing about critical reviews. And, as pointed out elsewhere, Stalone isn't playing himself.

Last edited at 23:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 20:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kambakkht Ishq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]