Talk:Tomb of Seti I

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt: Egyptian religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Cemeteries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Size

The KV14 page says that KV14 is 112 meters, while this KV17 page says KV17 is the longest but says KV17 is 100 meters, which is clearly shorter than 112 meters.

Tunnel There definitely should be an addition mention the tunnel. they spent 15 plus years digging it out i think it would be nice to mention even though it ended in a false door. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robwsc56 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:QV66 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:48, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Lehmann" reference

The reference to Christoph Lehmann's 2008 study was added by an IP last year ([1]). An IP, and then an account named "Chris Vienna", had previously tried to add similar information back in 2009 ([2]) but was reverted for verifiability reasons. I was doing some general revisions to the article just now and it seems I can find no record of, or reference to, Lehmann's study (either through Google, Google Scholar, etc or through my own university's library database) beyond Wikipedia, which would be unusual for a published reliable source (there should be some record of it). The citation also doesn't clarify all its bibliographical details. Can anyone clarify if this study is actually published and where it would be found? I'm starting to suspect that it is not a reliable source and that it was added by someone trying to promote their own work. R Prazeres (talk) 02:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: History of Ancient Egypt

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 January 2023 and 17 March 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lightfootcrytpkeeper (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Wikieditor1685, Dullaten45.

— Assignment last updated by Johnstoncl (talk) 19:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]