Talk:John Brent

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Anthroponymy

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was procedural close. While I would never do this just because of an improperly formatted multi-move, the bifurcated discussion here and at Talk:John Brent is going to make it very difficult to come to a consensus. The status quo of the author as the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC stands by default, with no prejudice against a new multimove request. --BDD (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Brent (disambiguation) → John Brent – I created this article unknowingly against the disambiguation style guide. It shouldn't contain the parenthetical, right? MyNameIsJason (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You are wrong. Why wouldn't it contain the parenthetical? A large number of disambiguation pages contain parenthetical "(disambiguation)". -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 00:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:MALPLACED. --BDD (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there is a related requested move at talk:John Brent, which this move depends on, therefore this is a malformatted multimove, and requires fixing. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 00:40, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No, it's fine as it is. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.