Jump to content

Talk:Kim Jin-hi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Jin Hi Kim)

U.S. citizen

[edit]

Should we describe her as a South Korean-born U.S. citizen? Badagnani 23:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

[edit]

Does she still live in Connecticut? Badagnani 06:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Living Tones"

[edit]

Was the "Living Tones" concept first presented publicly in 1985 or 1986? Badagnani (talk) 05:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Composer project review

[edit]

I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles. This article was raised to Composer B-class by a bot because another project (Biography) rated it as B-class. I find that the B rating is not merited; information contained in typical articles about modern composers is missing from it. My full review is on the comments page; questions or comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 02:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kim Jin-hi/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
==Composers Project Assessment of Kim Jin-hi: 2009-01-5==

This is an assessment of article Kim Jin-hi by a member of the Composers project, according to its assessment criteria. This review was done by Magicpiano.

If an article is well-cited, the reviewer is assuming that the article reflects reasonably current scholarship, and deficiencies in the historical record that are documented in a particular area will be appropriately scored. If insufficient inline citations are present, the reviewer will assume that deficiencies in that area may be cured, and that area may be scored down.

Adherence to overall Wikipedia standards (WP:MOS, WP:WIAGA, WP:WIAFA) are the reviewer's opinion, and are not a substitute for the Wikipedia's processes for awarding Good Article or Featured Article status.

===Origins/family background/studies=== Does the article reflect what is known about the composer's background and childhood? If s/he received musical training as a child, who from, is the experience and nature of the early teachers' influences described?

  • ok

===Early career=== Does the article indicate when s/he started composing, discuss early style, success/failure? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed?

  • Few personal details; composition history not integrated.

===Mature career=== Does the article discuss his/her adult life and composition history? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed?

  • Few personal details; composition history not integrated.

===List(s) of works=== Are lists of the composer's works in WP, linked from this article? If there are special catalogs (e.g. Köchel for Mozart, Hoboken for Haydn), are they used? If the composer has written more than 20-30 works, any exhaustive listing should be placed in a separate article.

  • Uncertain if listed works represented all of her works.

===Critical appreciation=== Does the article discuss his/her style, reception by critics and the public (both during his/her life, and over time)?

  • Style described; critical and popular reception missing.

===Illustrations and sound clips=== Does the article contain images of its subject, birthplace, gravesite or other memorials, important residences, manuscript pages, museums, etc? Does it contain samples of the composer's work (as composer and/or performer, if appropriate)? (Note that since many 20th-century works are copyrighted, it may not be possible to acquire more than brief fair use samples of those works, but efforts should be made to do so.) If an article is of high enough quality, do its images and media comply with image use policy and non-free content policy? (Adherence to these is needed for Good Article or Featured Article consideration, and is apparently a common reason for nominations being quick-failed.)

  • No images or sound.

===References, sources and bibliography=== Does the article contain a suitable number of references? Does it contain sufficient inline citations? (For an article to pass Good Article nomination, every paragraph possibly excepting those in the lead, and every direct quotation, should have at least one footnote.) If appropriate, does it include Further Reading or Bibliography beyond the cited references?

  • No references; no inline citations. External links are largely promotional.

===Structure and compliance with WP:MOS=== Does the article comply with Wikipedia style and layout guidelines, especially WP:MOS, WP:LEAD, WP:LAYOUT, and possibly WP:SIZE? (Article length is not generally significant, although Featured Articles Candidates may be questioned for excessive length.)

  • ok

===Things that may be necessary to pass a Good Article review=== Article is factually incomplete; GA seems unlikely to be achieved.

===Summary=== This article was raised to B-class by a bot, because another project (Biography) had rated it as B-class.

It is a somewhat typical modern composer promotional biography. It contains minimal early-life description, and a largely superficial description of her career and compositions. There is stylistic description of her work, but no critical or popular appreciation.

This article is Start-class; B-class articles should have more of the above information. Magic♪piano 02:53, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 21:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC)