Talk:Jess Asato

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on January 17 2013. The result of the discussion was delete.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

untitled

I don't know what was on the page which was deleted, but it appears that Asato is a notable person regardless of her being a candidate.Rathfelder (talk) 12:24, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing to stop you adding comments suggesting that she is nauseating.Perhaps she is. But in general the fact that people are abused in national newspapers tends to suggest they are noteableRathfelder (talk) 14:55, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very happy with the nauseating bit. I read somewhere that it was supposed to all be a joke. But people can draw their own conclusions.Rathfelder (talk) 20:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

I removed the ref to Make Justice Work - a single sentence on a dead website is not a reliable source. andy (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto the reference to her views as expressed in a piece she wrote herself for Total Politics - this fails WP:RS on at least two counts. andy (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Self-published or questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves"Rathfelder (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2014 (UTC)15:40, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]