Talk:Jacob Immanuel Schochet

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Judaism

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

"... it has been claimed that Schochet uses anger, polemics and an audiences lack on knowledge [sic] to convince them the Jesus could not be the Messiah."

This passage beginning "it has been claimed" tries to disguise the writer's own self-interested argument as an observation. That aside, one could objectively state that Schochet uses anger and polemics in presenting his own positions and swaying his audiences; but, in contrast, the statement that Schochet uses an audience's lack of knowledge to make his point intends to quietly make the argument that Schochet is undoubtedly wrong and that Jesus must be the messiah -- the writer's circular argument. The sentence assumes that Christianity is a truth discoverable by people in possession of adequate knowledge and that counter-arguments are based on ignorance and deception.

Cy 70.28.5.80 (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Also, the cited source for that section does not appear to be one that is considered reliable for the purposes of Wikipedia--it looks more like a personal essay. Having negative poorly sourced statements is particularly problematic for a biography of a living person, so I will remove this paragraph. Cheers, CordeliaNaismith (talk) 03:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite needed

I've begun removing some of the many opinions and personal attacks in this article. It needs a lot more work.Edstat (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jacob Immanuel Schochet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jacob Immanuel Schochet/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This page has very obviously been written with a pro-Chabad Lubavitch spin on it. It is full of weasel words and is presented in a specific way as to portray Chabad and Rabbi Schneersohn in the most positive light possible. It should be re-written to be more factual. Treespy (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 02:16, 30 June 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 19:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacob Immanuel Schochet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130625042029/http://www.sichosinenglish.org/books/to-know-and-to-care-1/14.htm to http://www.sichosinenglish.org/books/to-know-and-to-care-1/14.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacob Immanuel Schochet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130625042029/http://www.sichosinenglish.org/books/to-know-and-to-care-1/14.htm to http://www.sichosinenglish.org/books/to-know-and-to-care-1/14.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

This does not seem notable. Thoughts? --2603:7000:2143:8500:6DC8:71E:DA17:6742 (talk) 09:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Should be tagged for deletion. Yaakovaryeh (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]