Jump to content

Talk:UNRWA and Israel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Italy restores UNWRA funding

[edit]

https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/mondo/2024/05/25/tajani-litalia-riparte-con-i-finanziamenti-allunrwa_a96697db-8037-4192-8d93-1a539fd4f67c.html

Updating the image "UNRWA funding status (June 2024)"

[edit]

According to the table below the image, the UK has resumed funding, leaving the US the only country with suspended funding.

Portugal appears in gray, but the article states that it even increased its funding.

While writing this, I saw that Portugal actually pledged 10 million Euros, putting it above the cut-off for the 2022 pledges (despite having a lower GDP than 1 country on the list, not counting with Palestine) Daniel.sousa.me (talk) 10:21, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

[edit]

@Selfstudier: I am lost in the details. Can the three last lede paragraphs be removed as they are not a summary of the body, as well as being already summarized in the third lede paragraph? Makeandtoss (talk) 14:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really needs sorting out the body first, then the lead will take care of itself (and finally, summarizing back in the parent/removing the duplicated material from there). Selfstudier (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True but the current situation isn't readable. I think the 4th and 5th lede paragraphs can be removed for now from the lede without affecting the overall summary. Useful bits can be later extracted from them in the future. Makeandtoss (talk) 21:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, if you insist, then please do the summary of the new lead back at the main page and clean up the duplication (from when I copied all the UNRWA/Israel relations stuff over to here). Selfstudier (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which new lede and which main page? I am confused. Makeandtoss (talk) 22:51, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are redoing the lead here. Then summarize it and replace all the material in the main UNRWA article that I copied to here with the summary and this article as main. That was the whole point of the recent RM. Selfstudier (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You are going to include the relations between 67 and 2024 in the lead, right? Selfstudier (talk) 12:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will check what I can do here soon, need a few days. Makeandtoss (talk) 13:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I removed the duplicated material from the parent that was copied here, when the lead is finalized here, it needs to be summarized and included at the main article (I have left what was there before pending that being done). Selfstudier (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[1] Leaving this NYT article here; clearly articulates the 2024 controversy as: allegation of direct participation of 12, later expanded to reach 10% are involved; former allegation half disproved, later one unsubstantiated. Also mentions that UNRWA's creation was also due to push by Iraq and Egypt in 1951. Makeandtoss (talk) 11:19, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

latest NYT reporting

[edit]

See [2]. Reports show Hamas in UN schools Andre🚐 22:17, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I've added it to the article. Alaexis¿question? 21:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Small typo

[edit]

At the end of the "Background" section, the text reads: "the specific allegation that 12 UNWRA employees were involved in the Hamas-led assault on Israel". It should be UNRWA, not UNWRA. Could someone please fix this? I lack the necessary permissions. Maxime182752 (talk) 23:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]