Talk:Iraqi insurgency (2003–2011)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Iraqi insurgency (2003–2011) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4: 3 months

This page is not a forum for general discussion about views on politics or personal points of view. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about views on politics or personal points of view at the Reference desk.

Iraqi insurgency (2003–2011) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 1, 2004	Featured article candidate	Promoted
June 14, 2005	Featured article review	Kept
October 19, 2005	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as High-importance).

Iraq Top‑importance

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East / North America / United States / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

United States: History High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance).

Disaster management High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

On October 21, 2007, Iraqi insurgency (2003–2011) was linked from Reddit.com, a high-traffic website. (Traffic)

All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 8 sections are present.

First image

I'm not sure the image with the two insurgents is a good encyclopedic picture for being the first image displayed on this article... I feel strange to read an encyclopedia article and the first image be two insurgents who do attacks against Americans and who apparently aren't afraid of the camera. It looks more like a "publicity" photo rather than an educational photo... Who would want to read an educational encyclopedic article about a war and the first image she sees is two anti-Americans who kill American troops? I'm not saying to delete the image, but rather to put it somewhere else inside the article if not remove it altogether and keep a link to its Commons category or something... What are your opinions about this image as the first image? Should it stay or should it go? Sofia Lucifairy (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing, it kinda freaked me out when I first saw it, even though this message is bit late. Linphil (talk) 01:16, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two things

Hello, I'm an Iraqi War Veteran; 2005 and 2007-2008...First, this is a bad article...and needs some cleaning, but I do like the picture that it has...couldn't give an answer. Second, when they say Civil War 2006-2008, they are saying "Surge", maybe this will clarify that(from the media).Wnicholas70 (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Enhanced interrogation, Insurgency. This isn't serious.

The "insurgents" were a legitimate resistance movement that rose up against crimes committed by the occupying forces.

That this became a fertile soil for extremists doesn't change that. And the extremists exist on both sides. By both sides, I mean those supported by the USA. The Peshmerga are known to have committed war crimes, but are depicted in favorable light because they are on "our" side.

The legitimacy of the war itself is in doubt. So why not apply the same charitably interpretation to both sides?

The fact that Wikipedia uses euphemisms designed by a partisan party (the Bush admin) should be enough to give pause. My point is that Wikipedia should not be the mouthpiece for the US government.

At the very least this page could be called "Iraqi resistance and insurgency." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.253.73.146 (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Museum sacked? Not mentioned.

During either this time or a later time (2011-2013), one or more museums with ancient artifacts was sacked (perhaps the Baghdad Museum). This is a huge thing, but it is not mentioned in either article. Can someone with good knowledge and sources add it? Thank you! Misty MH (talk) 22:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, it's mentioned in 2003 invasion of Iraq#Security, looting and war damage, there's also a (low-quality) article on Archaeological looting in Iraq. But you're right it should be mentioned here as well. --Cerebellum (talk) 07:07, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fallujah killings of April 2003

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Fallujah_killings_of_April_2003

This event is not mentioned on this page or https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Iraq_War

Fallujah killings of April 2003 ignited the insurgency. The US is as responsible for the insurgency as it is for the initial invasion of Iraq. It should be made clear. As it stands now, the insurgency is presented as uncaused. "Shit just happens."

That the insurgency was caused by gross incompetence on the part of the US does not negate responsibility. We know that the US had no clue beyond the invasion, other than being greeted as liberators and there would be streets named after Bush. But nobody bought that nonsense.

"Terrorism in iraq" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Terrorism in iraq. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29#Terrorism in iraq until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 07:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Iraqi terrorism" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Iraqi terrorism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 29#Iraqi terrorism until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thepharoah17 (talk) 08:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Result

is the result correct? was it a victory for either side? or should we put stalemate? Ali36800p (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

term

A question, why is it called insurgency? Shouldn't it be called resistance since its against an occupational force and lasts exactly as long as the occupation? Perhaps insurgency is a more fitting term for the period after 2011? 185.89.234.7 (talk) 14:02, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]