Talk:International Street/GA3
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:International Street (Canada's Wonderland)/GA3)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: InTheAM (talk · contribs) 16:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
1. It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- There are many issues with the prose throughout the article. It needs a good copyedit.
- Some examples:
- During the park's first season, it was noticed that crowds would generally tend to go to the right side of International Street, towards the direction of Medieval Faire. - Sentence is by itself under the features heading. No context is given, so it seems irrelevant.
- In a 1979 report to the municipal government by Canada's Wonderland Ltd., titled "Maple Theme Park", the building was to sell: Camera and film shop (rentals and service), glass blower, glass cutter, china shop, European arts and crafts, Christmas decorations. - Sentence does not make sense as it is written. This problem is repeated multiple times.
- The building opened in 1981, Ristorante offered pizza, spaghetti Milanese,[11] and antipasto salad, while Gelati offered grape sherbet (possibly gelato) and tortoni. Souvenirs and novelties were offered at La Casa Del Regalo (Spanish for "The Gift House"), t-shirts, sweatshirts, and hats at Camicie (Italian for "shirts"), and magic tricks at Maschera (Italian for "mask"). - Two poor sentences in a row under Mediterranean Building heading. The first is a run-on. The second one is badly worded.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
3. It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- The article covers the intended topic.
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
5. It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
7. Overall: The article is almost the same as the version that failed in August. I agree with the last review and since very little has been done to address those issues, I am not going to pass the article as it is.
- Pass/Fail: