Talk:Information space
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
well that is a realy good information but who ever wrote this might wanna put more new information on google about science and outer space
He is a philosopher-idealist and pseudoscientist. See more on reviews Lurkmore.to (Переслегин) and http://www.fantlab.ru/work131786 by his essey "What is enough for Herodotus"--Philip J.1987qazwsx (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Merge "discussion"
[edit]From what I can see the merge request by RichardVeryard seems incomplete.
1. The links to the merge discussion only point to the Talk pages of each of the two articles separately fragmenting any discussion.
2. No section on either talk page has been created to deal with the merge request and not reasoning for the request has been given.
For these reasons, and as there is only one reply to the merge request, AGAINST (on this talk page), I suggest deleting the flags from both articles.
Notwithstanding this the two articles appear almost entirely unrelated, so if the discussion is begun I'm AGAINST it for that reason and because "information space" is an important everyday concept central to understanding the basic functioning of the web and so is referred to by other articles.
Both articles appear to need editing.
LookingGlass (talk) 13:44, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
I have removed my merger proposal and added a hatnote. --RichardVeryard (talk) 10:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Where does this concept belong?
[edit]As far as I can see from the references, this concept comes out of some work in Artificial Intelligence, so I have described it thus in the hatnote (here and at I-Space. If this is incorrect, please clarify the article appropriately. Actually, please clarify the article anyway. --RichardVeryard (talk) 10:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)