Jump to content

Talk:IndiGo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Indigo Airlines)

Fair use rationale for Image:IndigoAirlines Logo.jpeg

[edit]

Image:IndigoAirlines Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pricing policy

[edit]

The pricing policy section makes the article look more like an advertisement for IndiGo. So I deleted it. Adarsh Krishnaswamy 04:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

BinGo

[edit]

FYI, there is a company in Sydney called BinGo that transports truck sized rubbish bins which a left for a while on the property of their customers. The name is a play on Bingo the game. Tabletop (talk) 10:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orders

[edit]

Indigo converted 30 of their orders for the A320ceo to the A320neo (they now have 160); see: http://www.pdxlight.com/neomax.htm and http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/corporate-information/key-documents/?eID=dam_frontend_push&docID=36593 So please stop changing the number back to 130! SideshowBob7 (talk) 10:58, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An IP keeps changing the ceo order to 40, as far as I can see Airbus say they have ordered 260 which includes the ceo order, the original order was 100 and they have had 90 delivered, that leaves only ten to go. So where did the additional 30 come from, presume the IP is being confused by the 30 (where these new or options?) that have been converted to neos. MilborneOne (talk) 19:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They originally ordered 30 A320ceo together with the 150 A320neo family (130 A320 and 20 A321) in June 2011; see: http://www.airbus.com/presscentre/pressreleases/press-release-detail/detail/indigo-firms-up-order-for-150-a320neo-and-30-a320s/ and those 30 have been converted to neo last fall. SideshowBob7 (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that explanation, lets hope the IP user also understands, although another user has appeared to make the same wrong change! MilborneOne (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent accident that took place

[edit]

It has been seen that the recent accident that took place in indigo airlines flight are being removed by a user i request you to not to remove them as they are references from indian news channel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsh95 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The accident was not notable, just becuase it is referenced doesnt mean it should be included, brake fires and like are not that uncommon and nobody was fatally injured. Also suggest that re-adding it to the article without consensus after it has been challenged may be seen as being disruptive. MilborneOne (talk) 15:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Milborne. Not notable....William 15:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have reviewed it and I agree, it is not notable. This is a common incident with no serious damage and no injuries. Also you just broke the WP:3RR and are liable for a 24 hour block for WP:EW. - Ahunt (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not only has this user carried on edit warring after a 3RR warning, but he then carried on warring from an IP address. An admin has now semi-protected the article which will at least prevent the IP socking. - Ahunt (talk) 12:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for not noticing this discussion before adding it to the article. Though, I agree what you have said makes sense. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on IndiGo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on IndiGo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on IndiGo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:IndiGo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 09:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 09:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]
  • Expand the lead a bit more.checkY
  • Indian low-cost airline Why say Indian when we know a bit later that it is headquartered there?checkY
  • Also introduce Gangwal.checkY
  • The company went public Did it start as private? Mention.checkY
  • Duplink: low cost carrier.checkY

Corporate affairs and identity

[edit]
  • Rajesh Pratap Singh and Ambika Pillai Who are they?checkY
  • The airline has the tagline on-time focusing on its highly punctual service Possible bias. As if you support the IndiGo is "highly punctual".checkY

Fleet

[edit]
  • On the 15 October 2014 No "the"checkY
  • Sources: Are refs. 31, 34, 36 reliable?checkY

These done, I would be happy to promote this beautiful article. Good luck! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:09, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf:, Thanks! everything done! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Magentic Manifestations: Happy to have you back here! Ready for promotion. Cheers, Sainsf <^>Feel at home 18:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IndiGo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

indigo adress please — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.251.94.18 (talk) 06:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on IndiGo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on IndiGo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PC acceptances

[edit]

This [1] edit was acceppted by Vistadan (talk · contribs). It was unsourced, which means it was not supported by sources in the article, in a clear violation to a basic policy. This message is to let this editor know that the article has been PC-protected precisely in order to avoid these kind of changes, and that they contributed to the situation the protection intended to avoid, so please be more careful the next time you accept PC changes in any article. The edit has been reverted.--Jetstreamer Talk 01:20, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Jetstreamer, my mistake accepting that edit. I will be much more careful next time. – Vistadan 11:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet figures

[edit]

@MilborneOne and Unrave: We need to work out the fleet figures, particularly the orders. Thoughts?--

Jetstreamer Talk 13:42, 16 October 2018 (UTC) @Jetstreamer: I have updated the fleet numbers with latest data. In service fleet comes from the website. Orders are 430 (from the source cited) minus the 56 delivered. 125 have been converted to A321neo.[reply]

Destinations

[edit]

There are a total of 62 destinations Someone20111 (talk) 09:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the source supporting it?--Jetstreamer Talk 14:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 April 2019

[edit]

IndiGo doesn't have just A321NEO on order, but all 149 more orders and 1 completed delivery of those are for the A321LR version IL 96 400 (talk) 23:53, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not an edit request whatsoever.--Jetstreamer Talk 01:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IndiGo Airlines wiki page - Fleet

[edit]

Hello! I hope you are doing fine.

I wanted to let you know that IndiGo is planning to induct four Airbus A321P2F. The airline is expecting to receive its first A321 by June of 2021 and start its freighter operations soon after that. I would highly appreciate it if someone could add this into the fleet section of the airline's Wikipedia page. (I would have done it by myself however I don't know how to do it and am just figuring out Wikipedia's editing side:sweat-smile:)

Source for this: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/pandemic-effect-indigo-to-induct-freighters-in-its-fleet/articleshow/82183050.cms

Have a good day! --Hari.shreyas08 (talk) 06:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hey I found a new type logo of indigo, that is in their website Check it out here. https://download.logo.wine/logo/IndiGo/IndiGo-Logo.wine.png And give suggestion for editingPriyanshudhalglt (talk) 06:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why InterGlobe Enterprises details are missing ? InterGlobe Enterprises has many subsidiaries such as InterGlobe Technology Quotient

[edit]

Need to create a new page on 'InterGlobe Enterprises' Hexatron93 (talk) 12:51, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Often there is very little in the way of sources about holding companies, but if you can find enough for WP:CORP then sure you can create the InterGlobe Enterprises article. You can note that blue link leads back here to this article. - Ahunt (talk) 13:35, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Airbus A321-200

[edit]

The two Airbus A321-200 of IndiGo are the cargo version Airbus A321-200/P2F.
IndiGo does not operate the passenger version A321-200.
The Airbus Orders&Deliveries document states, that IndiGo has two "A321ceo", because the document does not differentiate here into the passenger and cargo version. WikiPate (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a ref for that? - Ahunt (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.airfleets.net/flottecie/Indigo-active-a321.htm
The only shown A321-200 are P2F – the cargo version.

IndiGo states its passenger aircraft types on its own official website:
"IndiGo operates the Airbus A320 CEO & NEO, the A321 NEO and the ATR 72-600 aircraft."
https://www.goindigo.in/travel-information/en/aircraft-and-routes.html
No A321-200 for passenger transport stated.

The Airbus Orders&Deliveries document shows passenger and cargo aircraft. Regarding IndiGo: Two stated "A321ceo" minus the two A321-200P2F cargo planes equal zero for the passenger version. Another example of a cargo plane in the document is the A330 of Wizz Air. WikiPate (talk) 20:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay that is useful to cite. - Ahunt (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

777?

[edit]

Why does the fleet section not list the 777s they have flown since last year? Mirza Ahmed (talk) 21:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No wet-leased aircraft in lists per WP:AIRLINE-FLEET-LIST.--Jetstreamer Talk 01:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose merging IndiGo fleet into IndiGo. That article was recently improperly split from this article. I have done the split properly for now. However, I do not agree that the article should have been split. IndiGo is neither an Airline with a significantly varied fleet nor is it very old to have a big former fleet. So the fleet section of the article was not big enough to justify the split. Hence the split should be reversed.

Pinging some relevant users: @Magentic Manifestations, Altoumulus, and Thewikizoomer. Arnav Bhate (talk • contribs) 06:13, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something must be done quickly. The fleet information is duplicated.--Jetstreamer Talk 13:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The airline has big enough and diverse fleet now and with the large order, it is just going to increase further, close to 20 years of fleet development history, the fleet having a different article is recommended so that the article about the airline doesn't focus too much on the fleet. Also information about grounded aircrafts, its issues and critical information of fleet can't be added to the primary airline article because again it will look more like an article about fleet than about the airline. Thewikizoomer (talk) 04:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Same as Thewikizoomer. The airline has 500 wings on order, having a separate fleet page is an optimal option. Varad27 (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-Same as majority people it shouldn't be merged at its the India's largest airline and It is suppose to get more aircrafts of different type.If air india, has different page for fleet which has lower fleet than indigo then why can't indigo have separate fleet page.It is easy to write fleet information like lease which Indigo often does 2406:7400:94:FAE4:7576:3A09:2085:4A2E (talk) 10:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - IndiGo only has ATR 72, A320s and A321s, which is not a really big diversity in the fleet, meaning that it should be merged, there are other airline article that have a bigger fleet diversity than IndiGo yet they are merged into the main article
Metrosfan (talk) 14:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:IndiGo&oldid=1262800974"