Jump to content

Talk:In Fiction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:In Fiction/Comments)

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:In Fiction/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Start class: it has some reasonable information & an infobox supplied. Huge problem with content is the need for independent (not band sites, record labels nor fansites) in-line references for verification: currently only the Triple J reference (#3) qualifies the rest are NOT independent. Other statements made in this article could be deleted. While at ref #3 site, I checked date formed: is it 2004 or 2005? Rest of article requires more details, sections and wikifying: make it sound less like an advert/blog and more neutral in tone.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 06:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 06:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on In Fiction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]