Talk:Hyland Software
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hyland Software article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 September 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
NPOV
[edit]Question: Do these press-release-like, paid, self-promoting, if not self-published "sources" (like crainscleveland, etc.), which are obviously part of a company's own PR strategy qualify as reliable sources?
As is, the whole article sounds like an extension of the company's own PR campaign and the main editor seems to have obvious conflict of interest issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.217.14.70 (talk) 18:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Have the above concerns been addressed sufficiently in the last few years since that question was posed? It looks like much of the advertising language has been removed. Some of the reliable sources issues are still present but now are supporting basic facts and may be less of an issue for the neutrality.
- Unclear specifically where your contention lies. This is a pretty standard article about a relatively un-newsworthy software company. There's no reason for the NYT to pick up an article about a Cleveland business showing steady growth, so we would expect most of the unsensational claims here to be drawn from unsensational sources, like local business journals and press releases. I see nothing to indicate Crians is self-published, so that accusation seems at least as dubious as anything in the article. Replacing use of the word "solution", but otherwise going to de-tag the article until something more specific can be demonstrated. 71.223.77.249 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hyland Software/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
I've been trying to expand this page to the best of my abilities to improve its quality. Any suggestions for more content? --Kaitlin510 (talk) 12:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 12:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Ohio articles
- Low-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles