Talk:Vermiviatum covidum

A fact from Vermiviatum covidum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 March 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the flatworm Humbertium covidum (pictured), named after the COVID-19 pandemic, was classified in a study written mostly during the initial lockdown?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Humbertium covidum.

Animals Mid‑importance

Vermiviatum covidum is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to animals and zoology. For more information, visit the project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Animals To-do:

Here are some Open Tasks :

Copyedit:
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Improve: Photoperiodism, Tool use by non-human animals, Omnivore, Animal suicide, Sphaerium beckmani (a species in family Sphaeriidae),
Requests:
- Mammals:
- Invertebrates: Campocraspedon
- Fishes: Zaniolepis frenata
Merge: GLAM/ARKive donated texts into articles about endangered species.
Expand: Junqueira cow, Atka mackerel
Nominate and vote: Science collaboration of the month, Article Improvement Drive, WikiProject Animals Collaboration

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

COVID-19 Mid‑importance

	COVID-19 portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Troubled.elias (talk) 07:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Humbertium covidum

... that flatworm Humbertium covidum was named after the COVID-19 pandemic? Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that flatworm Humbertium covidum, named after the COVID-19 pandemic, was classified in a study written mostly during the initial lockdown? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Crime in Latvia
- Comment: ALT0 is probably better, to be honest :) found a news story, found that someone had written the wiki article, I couldn't resist.

Created by Mayra SA (talk). Nominated by Theleekycauldron (talk) at 05:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Interesting article, interesting hook. I agree that ALT1 is more interesting. Cute flatworm. Guettarda (talk) 20:39, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the speedy review, Guettarda! To clarify, you think ALT1 is more interesting? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 04:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, yes I misread what you said. I like ALT1 better, but either one is good. Guettarda (talk) 04:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Gotcha- either one works for me as well! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 05:17, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving ALT1 to Prep 6, with slight copyedits to the hook for flow. What a quirky, adorable fella! ‍ ‍ elias. 🧣 ‍ ‍ ^{💬reach out to me}
_{📝see my work} 07:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"black"

I saw the text saying it was classed under the synonym Diversibipalium "black", which looked to me as though it was glossing diversibipalium as "black", which would clearly have been an error.

By the time I took out the third one, it occurred to me that maybe that wasn't what was meant, that maybe the specific epithet is the entire phrase "Diversibipalium 'black' ", as opposed to Diversibipalium something else. If that's the case, my apologies, but it's still super-confusing. In that case, could someone reword it so it's clear? --Trovatore (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These corrections were unecessary and erroneous and were reverted. Please read primary resources before editing and please learn about the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature before editing pages. The etymology of the name Diversibipalium "black" is clearly explained in the paper by Justine et al. (2018) and this name is clearly cited in the paper by Justine et al. (2022), including the abstract: "The new species Humbertium covidum n. sp. (syn: Diversibipalium “black” of Justine et al., 2018) is formally described..." Both 2018 and 2022 papers are openaccess. Mayra SA (talk) 21:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It may well be explained in the sources, but it's still confusing to readers — it looks like it's saying that diversipalium means black. Please fix the confusing aspect rather than taking an attitude with the person who points it out to you. --Trovatore (talk) 03:08, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that condescending to say people should perhaps read sources before editing articles to make sure they understand what the article is saying and that they don't introduce errors. If you had offered a suggestion to make it less confusing to you, perhaps that would have been better. In any event, I'm not sure it's necessary to change it, but Mayra SA maybe The species was initially mentioned using the provisional name "Diversibipalium sp. 'black'" in 2018 (a wording found six times in Justine et al. 2018 and also once in Justine et al. 2022:8) the first time it's mentioned might possibly prevent future editors from misinterpreting this as a gloss, especially since LittleWhole also had this issue as well. Umimmak (talk) 05:16, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, to me it also *looked like a gloss until I thought about it for a while. Was pretty confusing. LittleWhole (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I simply changed a sentence, current version is now "At this time, the species was assigned to the genus Diversibipalium Kawakatsu et al., 2002, a collective group created to accommodate species whose anatomy of the copulatory apparatus is still unknown, and was not given a Latin species name, hence "black", a simple adjective." I hope this is simple and clear. Mayra SA (talk) 21:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's not bad. --Trovatore (talk) 02:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]