Jump to content

Talk:Hugh S. Johnson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Hugh Samuel Johnson)

TIME Cover

[edit]

Please don't put the TIME cover back again. I'm seriously considering removing it entirely from Wikipedia: we have too many TIME covers and I'm going through a process of deleting ones that aren't entirely necessary to the project. - Ta bu shi da yu 16:36, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a little POV too isn't it? As if Johnson was a great man. RJII 20:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted deletion of Ta_bu_shi_da_yu, if Ta_bu_shi_da_yu deletes photo again, please immediatly report him to vandalism in progress, as he has been warned.Travb 22:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Johnson dominated the Amerian economy for a year or so, as the TIME story indicates. Cover is fair use because it proves Johnson's visibility and importance was widely recognized. Rjensen 00:34, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism

[edit]

This page contains text plagiarized from the Arlington National Cemetery Web site.[1] I've tried to remove what I can, but others should be on the lookout for it as well. Thank you! - Tim1965 (talk) 15:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think part of the website was copied from an early version of this article. Rjensen (talk) 17:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

15th Brigade

[edit]

There is a problem with the following statement, but I can't pin down the exact problem:

He was put in command of the 15th Infantry Brigade, but the unit did not deploy to Europe because the war had ended.

First off, the link is to 15th Division (United States), which indeed did not deploy to Europe, but under the organization in place in World War I, the 15th Infantry Brigade was part of the 8th Division, which did deploy to Europe, but did not see any fighting. Carolina wren (talk) 02:56, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I had a discussion with User_talk:Rjensen about The Time Magazine External Link being a paywall link. Currently we agreed to keep the link 'as is'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeugzeug (talkcontribs) 14:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]