Jump to content

Talk:Hoodoo Gurus discography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former FLCHoodoo Gurus discography is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 30, 2008Featured list candidateNot promoted
May 29, 2016Featured list candidateNot promoted
Current status: Former featured list candidate

Wikitables

[edit]

More work is needed on this article. Perhaps good wikitables would improve it but I'm not sure how to create a wikitable so that the information is displayed better. The singles-only section (which I've just added) is a work in progress and is expected to be replaced by a better section / wikitable once I learn how (someone else is certainly welcome to do so).Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some wikitables both for albums and singles have been added/edited by Dan arndt (and the undersigned), thereby improving this article. A table of B-sides is to follow.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:03, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested WP:DISCOG assessment

[edit]

A quick assessment of the list:

  • The lead is far too long. Try and get it down to three paragraphs or thereabouts.

Working on it.Dan arndt (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The "Discography" section-header is unnecessary: we already know this is a discography from the title.

Done.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • In general, the style is a little unorthodox. I'd recommend taking a look at the WP:DISCOG style guideline proposals for some ideas. Granted, it's still in the proposal stages, but that should help a little. A few such issues I see:
  • The "Singles released" table isn't necessary, since it's echoed in the singles table itself.

I deleted the Singles released column from the Albums table.

  • "Charts" isn't specific enough. It should be "Peak chart positions" or something like that.

Done.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The US column is uncited.

Done.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • The dates are over-wikilinked, as are the labels.
Reduced labels over-wikilinkage. Still to do dates.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Dan arndt (talk) 04:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • All data is presumed to be the original release. Information pertaining to re-releases aren't necessary, unless particularly notable.

Re-releases deleted.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Saying "Eighth studio album" and so on is unnecessary.

Deleted ordinals except "Debut studio album".Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Certifications are usually given their own column
I'm working on the wikitables (including adding a cert col) at my sandbox copy. I'm not very good at wikitables and keep having trouble with the column Head not being automatically coloured correctly.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Found the problem a couple of | needed to be ! Now working on aligning column widths a little better.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "AUS chart peak" column in Video/DVD isn't necessary.
Done. Also increased width of second column.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Smaller font used in some of the tables is also unnecessary.
Font size within tables now 10pt or greater: some column headings may be smaller.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully that'll get things moving in the right direction. For some more general help take a look at the WP:DISCOG style guidelines, and also take a look at some current FL discographies, my personal favorite being Nine Inch Nails discography. Let me know if there's anything else I can help with. Drewcifer (talk) 08:26, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a first go, more to follow.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
More done but still not finished.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Still working on wikitables: trying to add a Certificate col where appropriate.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Got it to work at last, now onto column widths.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stoneage Romeos @ Billboard?

[edit]

Stoneage Romeos is listed as having #209 chart place in the US. What list is that? The US list is supposed to be the Billboard 200, and #209 does not fit into top 200 list. 85.217.34.34 (talk) 19:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that an anonomous editor 75.170.87.124 went through a whole lot of discographies on 24 April 2011 and listed various albums as reaching #209 on the Billboard 200, unfortunately it wasn't picked up earlier - I have corrected the vanadalism on the Hoodoo Gurus Discography.Dan arndt (talk) 02:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hoodoo Gurus discography/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article now contains a better Lead, has improved wikitables with information on albums and singles. Lead could be improved further, a wikitable of B-sides could also be provided. I have recently contributed to this article and may be biased.Shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 05:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:14, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Hoodoo_Gurus_discography&oldid=1202352743"