Jump to content

Talk:Honeywell Aerospace Technologies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Honeywell Aerospace)

New Draft

[edit]

I have a paid COI with Honeywell, who I'm helping improve this article in compliance with Wikipedia's policies and ethical best practices for a paid COI. See my disclosure here. I wanted to let anyone watching this article I'm working on a draft Honeywell Aerospace article here and to invite neutral editors to review, edit, or comment on the draft. In accordance to what I believe to be ethical best practices for a paid COI, I will only be asking a neutral editor to implement these changes on my behalf, such as is done with the {{request edit}} process, if they feel the edits are an improvement to the article.

I've made similar Talk page notes on the articles on Avionics and NextGen.

Corporate (talk) 22:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{Request edit}}

I've completed my draft here and would like to request an impartial editor move it into article-space if they find the article acceptable. Corporate 15:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request handled by User:Pol430 (see diff here). I've also added a connected contributors tag. Corporate 20:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unproven Claim

[edit]

In the first paragraph of this article is a claim that Honeywell is the largest producer of avionics/engines. This is not well substantiated, largest producer in Phoenix, Texas, USA, the World? Where needs to be properly defined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.160.10 (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honeywell Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Honeywell Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Honeywell Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes 11 and 24 are duplicates and don't support what they're cited to support

[edit]

At the time I'm typing this, Footnote 11 and Footnote 24 go to EXACTLY the same URL at the Los Angeles Times. Furthermore, Footnote 11 exists to support the claim that the purchase price was $1.025 billion, while footnote 24 exists to support the claim that the purchase price was $1.029 billion. It can't be both, right? The LA Times article says $1.025 billion. That LA Times article itself is not well-written, because it says also "other estimates of its price were closer to $800 million". Why would the LA Times refer to these ESTIMATES when Unisys's own official announcement says "$1.025 billion"? A GOOD newspaper might have included the text "other estimates of its price HAD BEEN closer to $800 million" to make it clear that the statement refers not to the sales-price but to earlier, now-superseded GUESSES as to the sales-price.2600:1700:6759:B000:E894:BFCC:705D:880 (talk) 20:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence Simpson[reply]