Jump to content

Talk:History of Microsoft/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

GA review

the article is well-cited, factual and provides a good coverage of the topic. good effort has been put by you. i will gladly pass this article and claim it as a GA. Cheers, Sushant gupta (talk) 04:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Retake of the original 1978 photo

As Bill Gates prepares to leave Microsoft, he assembled the original crew back for another photo. Here's the article, from Newsweek. Dr. Cash (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

using of the term

  • ...first used in a letter from Gates to Allen on November 29, 1975, and on November 26, 1976 the name became a registered trademark
  • ...and on November 29, 1979, the term, "Microsoft" was first used by Bill Gates
  • ...On January 1, 1979, the company moved from Albuquerque to a new home in Bellevue
  • ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hartmann Schedel (talk • contribs) 12:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- sorry that I forgot to sign ;-( -- Hartmann Schedel (talk) 13:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

The image Image:Windows Aero.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

First public use of "Micro Soft"

The first public use of "Micro Soft" was earlier than the November 29, 1975 letter from Gates to Allen. It was used in the October 1975 issue of Computer Notes in a monthly column by Ed Roberts, the President of MITS. (Volume 1, Issue 5, Page 3.) [1]

Roberts answers customer's questions:

3. Comment: MITS should give BASIC to its customers.
Answer: Wrong. We made a $180,000 royalty commitment to Micro Soft in order to have BASIC available to our customers. MITS makes essentially no profit on BASIC.

On page two the newsletter editor, Davis Bunnell, discusses the publication schedule and the October issue was to be printed on October 24; readers would receive it in early November. [2]

-- SWTPC6800 (talk) 18:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Price For 86-DOS

There seems to be conflicting information on how much Microsoft paid for 86-DOS. On this page it says, "Microsoft purchased a CP/M clone called 86-DOS from Tim Paterson of Seattle Computer Products for less than US$50,000, which IBM renamed to PC-DOS." but the source names it as $75,000 and Timeline of x86 DOS operating systems names it as "less than US$100,000" (which seems more correct given the sourced figure). I'm going to change this one to "less than US$100,000" as well, so as to be consistent with the other article and the source.

--Bfarb (talk) 06:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Interpreter did NOT work

" When Allen flew to Albuquerque, New Mexico to meet with MITS, the interpreter worked and MITS agreed to distribute Altair BASIC.[9] "

Actually, the interpreter crashed on the second command.

Source: STARTUP: Albuquerque and the Personal Computer Revolution, a permanent exhibition funded by Paul Allen at the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science in Albquerque. Ds77 (talk) 02:18, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Recent history needs clean-up

Contents since 2010 are more like list than in proper prose style.--Zetifree (talk) 06:11, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on History of Microsoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Is that english?

"The idea that would spawn Microsoft terminated boi when..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefanreich2012 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of Microsoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on History of Microsoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on History of Microsoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Microsoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Microsoft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

1972 -> 1975

The article says Microsoft began on or about January 1, 1975, but the first section is dated "1972–1985". The main Microsoft article mentions Traf-O-Data in 1972, but that text isn't here, so I've changed the section title to "1975–1985" pending the addition of material on earlier events. 98.247.224.9 (talk) 07:43, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Microsoft/Archive_2&oldid=1029062690"