Jump to content

Talk:HSwMS Loke (1869)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Lede is slightly anaemic, and could do with another sentence to flesh it out.
    I honestly don't know what to add; there's already pretty serious duplication between the lead and the service para.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Do we know why funds were withheld from her when requested?
    Not specifically, but probably because it was thought obsolete.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

One small question, possibly unanswerable, and an expansion to the lede, and this will be good to go. Skinny87 (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]