Talk:HMS Keith/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 00:11, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Comments

Some details in the inf box are uncited

Pennant number: H06

Cited, and fixed.

Motto: Fatis Fortitor Virtua ("Valour is stronger than fate")

Badge: On a Field Silver, a Boar's head, Red.

Deleted.

Scuttled or sunk by Keith ?
- Sunk.

Note that I've moved this to HMS Keith (1930) since it had the wrong pendant number. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:35, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On hold

Some small points, I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Jim Sweeney (talk) 23:14, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]