Talk:The Annual Global Orgasm for Peace

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 11 March 2018, see discussion.
keep, 2006-12-20, see discussion.

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Alexis Kleinman, Maxwell Strachan (14 January 2015). "The 49 Most Entertaining Wikipedia Entries Ever Created". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 8 March 2015.

Untitled

Is it okay if I have more than one orgasm on the day? --The Lone Bard 05:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apart from the bad vocabulary and grammar, is this even real...anyone can make a site, i dont think anyone will actually follow through with it, i dont think this a encyclopedia suited article. there is no rela source or evidence or any backing. ---86.133.173.233 23:32, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the 334,000 Google hits, it's either real or an incredibly widespread hoax. I don't know why, but I've previoulsy heard of this somehow... then again, maybe someone was just trying to draw me into a huge lie. -- Kicking222 02:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that it's really a hoax as such. It's more of a psuedo-science or pseudo-religious sort of thing. It would be a hoax if they were claiming that Global Orgasm had or definitely would change the world, whereas this seems more like an attempt to prove whether or not its possible. So I'm certainly not standing in the way of progress ~.^--The Sporadic Update 02:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be a lot of hype about this, so I don't see why it has the deletion tag. --Proficient 17:50, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're absolutely right. There are many ways to protest against anything and these people have invented their own way. Believe it or not, but they are going to be remembered, and I think they deserve to be mentioned in an encyclopedia at least for the fact of trying. However, the article should be enlarged. That's for sure! Siliconov 12:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the notability is sufficient, I count 5 votes to remove the Notability tag and only the one vote against. Additionally, the feedback about insufficient evidence has now been addressed and also the article has been expanded a little. So I propose that enough improvements have been made and if consensus remains in 7 days time, to remove the Notability tag from the head of the article, and move the Multiple issues box lower down the page. Primarily for aesthetic reasons.

Mediation4u (talk) 09:00, 27 July 2011 (UTC) ^{editing is fun}[reply]

Draft box for update next week - edited, syntax corrected and moved lower in the article.

{{Multiple issues|update=January 2010|citation style=November 2010}}

Mediation4u (talk) 10:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC) ^{editing is fun}[reply]

:: No opposition, consensus reached, so box syntax corrected and moved lower on page. Mediation4u (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC) ^{editing is fun}[reply]

Nonfactual content

Amended the line about the Global Consciousness Movement having 'evidence' that proves anything other than that they've smoked way too many drugs to be allowed near science. The article itself seems borderline, really. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.18.204 (talk) 09:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I propose to add well-established evidence from neuroscience that orgasm releases the hormone oxytocin, which has been called the "love and trust" hormone by scientists. Many references from academic primary and secondary sources are evidence with scientific evaluation of the increase in trust produced by oxytocin - in fact there is such a strong positive "feel good" effect that oxytocin clouds objective judgement. Mediation4u (talk) 07:02, 27 July 2011 (UTC) ^{editing is fun}[reply]

No opposition, so paragraph added. with notable references. Mediation4u (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2011 (UTC) ^{editing is fun}[reply]

"Official website"

http://www.globalorgasm.org forwards to https://boldpleasures.com/globalorgasmday, a website selling sex toys. Darsie42 (talk) 12:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]