Talk:Gleneagles Hospital

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Hospitals Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please check dates

According to WP:OTRS Ticket:2014032510004266, the building was an hotel until the end of 1958 and the hospital opened in 1959. Guy (Help!) 18:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Nanyang Technological University/ Information Technology (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Peer review

Information Technology (For usage of school project)

Strengths

There is a detailed documentation of the history of the hospital. (ie when it started, who started the establishment) It gives the readers a better understanding of the past purpose of the building. The article is well referenced. Much of the information written is from secondary sources, not ones they found out first hand from interviews etc. The references were also from reliable sources such as its main website as well. Reference links to the page are also all valid, there were no broken links. There was also an interesting list of miscellaneous information. Such as the list of achievements it has acquired over the years of operation. It also clearly lists the facilities and treatment clearly, giving people an easier time for a quick look through. Clear and concise headings were given for each section, giving users less to look through if they are looking for a specific item. Keywords in the article were also linked to other wiki pages and external links, It makes it more convenient for users when such links are provided.

Recommendations

We felt that they could have added a ‘Nearest MRT’ section, as we think that it might be potentially useful for people to know. We felt that the article could be written more objectively, as we found that there were a few sentences that are a little bias. Ie “It is renowned for attracting many foreigners around the region due to its excellent patient care record”. It was also tagged for being written like an advertisement. We felt that the achievements could also be written in a chronological order, for purpose of better presentation. We felt that more information could have been provided on the summary box on the right of the article. Information such as the founder, the type of hospital (private/public) could be added.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gleneagles Hospital. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]