Jump to content

Talk:Get It Right (Glee cast song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleGet It Right (Glee cast song) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 13, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
July 7, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Page title

[edit]

Can I ask why the page is currently titled "Get It Right (Glee Cast song)", as opposed to "Get It Right (Glee cast song)"? J Milburn (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glee Cast is the name of the group: a proper noun. Yves (talk) 16:47, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, makes sense. J Milburn (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Get It Right (Glee Cast song)/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--FeuDeJoie (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously you saw my review before, (got your message) and looking through it the changes you have made seem to have developed the article correctly. I will be looking through it in more detail tomorrow but the bets are that it is going to become a GA.

Original review

[edit]

Prose

[edit]

Article is generally well written;

Introduction

  • The sentence "who produced the song, with his wife, Nikki Hassman," is there need for repetitive commas - "who produced the song with his wife Nikki Hassman". Edit punctuation Microsoft Word grammar check flagged this as incorrect also. --Done.

Background

  • Same problem as above with the second sentence in the section.--Better
  • The remainder of the section is very well written and punctuation is excellent.

Composition

  • Well written, no obvious problems.

Critical reception

  • Voerding, Who is this? You have previously discussed him in the composition section but for a first time reader it seems as if he is a random person as no publisher is listed in this section only in the composition section. It is confusing. Add more detail.
  • Other than listed above the section is easy to read, factual and understandable.--Done

Chart performance

  • Chart positions need its own section change positions to a separate section: Charts.--Done
  • Well written, factual and clear.

Factually accurate?

[edit]
  • No problems; no outstanding references needed, no original research and all notable.

Coverage

[edit]
  • Factual, doesn't waffle and everything is relevant.

Neutral

[edit]
  • Not biased, Critical reception show a good mix of responses.

Stable

[edit]
  • No edit wars. Stable.

References

[edit]

Critical reception

  • Reference 5 Seattle Post-Intelligencer, it is repeated twice in one continuous sentence. Why? --Done.

Overall

[edit]

All the issues have been met, I will pass this now. Thanks for the changes.

Thank you for taking the time to conduct a second review. Much appreciated! Frickative 01:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Get It Right (Glee cast song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:46, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Get It Right (Glee cast song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Get_It_Right_(Glee_cast_song)&oldid=1205831705"